##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Sep 10, 2019

Isaac Cooper  

Jimmy Yon

Abstract

In recent years, the social application of biometrics has brought great benefits, but also caused people’s concerns about privacy protection, autonomy, and social exclusion. Here we have sorted out the ethical issues related to the application of biometrics, such as privacy protection, functional transformation, body informationization, informed consent, and social exclusion, and analyzed their core and unique issues. We believe that the current management specifications for the development and application of biometric technology are significantly behind their development. In addition to the introduction of policies, the regulation or governance of biometrics technology should also accelerate the practice of ethical governance and regulatory governance.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Biometrics, Ethnicity, Privacy, Autonomy, Social Exclusion

References
1. CSSS Policy Brief No.1. Biometric Identification Technology Ethics. (2003-11-03). https://danishbiometrics.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/news_2.pdf. (2018-4-20).

2. Association for Biometrics (AfB). International Computer Security Association (ICSA). 1998 Glossary of Biometric Terms. Information Security Technical Report, 1998, 3(1): 98-108.

3. Mordini E, Petrini C. Ethical and Social Implications of Biometric Identification Technology. Ann Ist Super Sanita, 2007, 43(1): 5-11.

4. Rand. Army Biometric Applications: Identifying and Addressing Sociocultural Concerns. California: Rand, 2001.

5. EC. Working Paper of the Data Protection Working Party of the European Commission: Biometrics. Brussels: EC, 2003.

6. BIOVISION. Roadmap to Successful Deployments from the User and System Integrator Perspective. Amsterdam: Biovision, 2004.

7. OECD. Biometric-based Technologies. Paris: OECD, 2004.

8. European Commission. Biometrics at the Frontiers: Assessing the Impact on Society. Italy: European Commission Joint Research Centre, 2005.

9. National Science and Technology Council. The National Biometrics Challenge. America: National Science and Technology Council (NSTC), 2006.

10. National Science and Technology Council. Biometrics Foundation Documents. America: National Science and Technology Council (NSTC), 2006.

11. National Science and Technology Council. Privacy & Biometrics. America: National Science and Technology Council (NSTC), 2006.

12. Data Security Council of India. Biometrics and Ethics-EU Project RISE. India: Data Security Council of India (DSCI), 2009.

13. Rebera AP, Bonfanti ME, Venier S. Societal and Ethical Implications of Anti-spoofing Technologies in Biometrics. Sci Eng Ethics, 2014, 20(1): 155-169.

14. Kumar A, Zhang D. Ethics and Policy of Biometrics. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2010.

15. Thomson J. The Right to Privacy. New York: Cambridge university Press, 1984.

16. Cavoukian A. Fingerprint Biometrics: Address Privacy Before Deployment. Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario, 2008.

17. Feng J, Jain. FM Model Based Fingerprint Reconstruction from Minutiae Template, 2009.

18. Mordini E, Massari S. Body, Biometrics and Identity. Bioethics, 2008, 22(9): 488-498. DOI: 10.1111/biot.2008.22.issue-9.

19. Irish Council for Bioethics. Biometrics, Enhancing Security, or Invading Privacy. Dublin: Irish Council for Bioethics, 2009.

20. Van Der Ploeg I. Genetics, Biometrics and the Informatization of the Body. Ann Ist Super Sanita, 2007, 43(1): 44-50.

21. Tzaphlidou M, Pavlidou FN. Biometrics Applications: Technology, Ethics, and Health Hazards. Special issue. Scientific World Journal, 2011, (11): 529-531.

22. Rachel J, Minter. The Informatization of the Body: What Biometric Technology Could Reveal to Employers about Current and Potential Medical Conditions. In: American Bar Association. Labor & Employment Law Section National Conference on Equal Employment Opportunity Law. Louisiana: International privacy issues panel, 2011: 227–242.

23. Alterman A. “A Piece of Yourself”: Ethical Issues in Biometric Identification. Ethics and Information Technology, 2003, 5(3): 139-150

24. Data Protection Commissioner. Data Protection Guidelines on Research in the Health Sector. Ireland: Data Protection Commissioner, 2007.

25. Wickins J. The Ethics of Biometrics: the Risk of Social Exclusion from the Widespread Use of Electronic Identification. Sci Eng Ethics, 2007, 13(1): 45-54.

26. Information Commissioner’s Offce. The Use of Biometrics in Schools. UK: Information Commissioner’s Offce, 2008.

27. BECTA. Becta Guidance on Biometric Technologies in Schools. UK: BECTA , 2007.

28. Prabhakar S, Pankanti S, Jain A K. Biometric Recognition: Security and Privacy Concerns. Security & Privacy, IEEE, 2003, 99(2): 33-42.

29. European Union. Ethics of Security and Surveillance Technologies. http://grundrechte.ch/2014/opinion_28_securityandsurveillancetechnologies.pdf. (2018–04–20).

30. Mordini E, Tzovaras D. Second Generation Biometrics: The Ethical, Legal and Social Context. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
How to Cite
Cooper, I., & Yon, J. (2019). Ethical Issues in Biometrics. Science Insights, 30(2), 63-69. https://doi.org/10.15354/si.19.re095
Section
Review