##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Jun 12, 2016

Evelin Segrott  

Abstract

Teacher irregularity is a noteworthy issue confronting numerous educational institutes. A high rate of irregularity of teachers from their posts is a serious obstruction to conveyance of education in many developing countries, but hard proof on the issue has been rare. There are more than a few critical variables that are associated with increased irregularity of teachers: poor working conditions, for example, poorer groups and infrastructure; teachers with less binds to the school's communities; contract teaching, absence of unpredictable supervision and appraisal, allotting instructor's non-teaching obligations, instructors strike and absence of congruity amongst guardians and educators are key reasons for teachers irregularity. By contrast, delegations for more lively top-down and base up observing are not connected with lower absence. These outcomes, together with the moderately high general state funded teacher participation rates in a situation where monetary impetuses for execution are frail, propose that non-financial motivators are imperative determinants of teacher performance. Head instructors and Education Officers has involved teachers for coming to class late, leaving right on time from school, teachers being in school and not taking care of their lessons and teachers doing private business amid working hours. The primary goal of this study is to figure out what the key elements of teacher’s irregularity are and how these factors influence students’ performance in their academic career. The study prescribes that with a specific end goal to decrease teacher irregularity there is need to address personal, school and environmental factors prompting teacher irregularity successfully.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Teacher, Student, Education, Performance, Outcomes

References
1. Dixit A. Power of incentives in public versus private organizations. Am Eco Rev Paper Proceed, 1997; 87:378-382.

2. Ehrenberg R, Rees D, Ehrenberg E. School district leave policies, teacher absenteeism and student achievement. J Human Resourc 1991; 26:72-105.

3. Abeles L. Absenteeism among teachers - Excused absence and unexcused absence, Intern J Edu Adm 2009; 1:31-49.

4. Chaudhury N, Hammer J, Kremer M, Muralidharan K, Rogers H. Missing in action: teacher and health workers absence in developing countries. J Eco Persp 2006; 20:91-116.

5. Akazar L, Rogers HF, Chaudhury N, Hammer J, Kremer M, Muralidharan k. Why are teachers absent? Probing service delivery in Peruvian Primary schools. Unpublished paper, World Bank and GRADE (Peru) Muralidhana 2004.

6. Bowers T. Teacher’s absenteeism and ill health retirement: A review. Cambridge J Edu 2001; 31:135-157.

7. Ehrenberg RG, Ree DI, Ehrenberg EL. School district leaves policies, teacher absenteeism and student achievement. J Human Resourc 1991; 26:72-105.

8. Frank S, Baroody K, Gordon J. First Steps: What School Systems Can Do Right to Improve Teacher Compensation and Career Path. Education Resource Strategies. 2013; Available at: https://www.erstrategies.org/library/first_steps

9. Obeng-Denteh W. Yeboah E. Asiamah SC, Monkah JE. The impact of student and teacher absenteeism on student performance at the junior high school: the case of the Kumasi-metro school district. Cont J Edu Res 2011; 4:7-17.

10. Rosenblatt Z, Shirom A. Predicting teacher absenteeism by personal background factor. J Edu Admin 2005; 43:209-255.

11. Kremer M, Muralidharan K, Cahudhury N, Hammer J, Rogers HF. Teacher absenteeism in India: A snapshot. J Eur Eco Assoc 2005;1-10.
How to Cite
Segrott, E. (2016). Teacher’s Irregularity and Students Performance: A Causative Analysis. Science Insights, 2016(8), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.15354/si.16.ar317
Section
Original Article