Short Videos: The Real Detrimental Inducer for Concealed Brain Damage
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
In the digital age, our constant connectivity and reliance on technology have brought about a new concern: concealed brain damage. This hidden threat to our cognitive well-being is often exacerbated by the pervasive presence of short videos in our daily lives. As we immerse ourselves in the captivating world of screens, the detrimental effects on our brain health become increasingly apparent. Understanding the impact of short videos on our cognitive function is crucial to navigating the modern landscape of technological consumption. This article delves into the nuanced relationship between short videos and concealed brain damage, shedding light on the neurological, cognitive, psychological, and emotional implications of excessive screen time. By identifying these detriments and exploring strategies for mitigating the risks, we can strive to promote healthy tech habits for optimal brain health in an increasingly digital world.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Short Video, Brain Damage, Neural Mechanisms, Mental Health, Cognition
2. Firth J, Torous J, Stubbs B, Firth JA, Steiner GZ, Smith L, Alvarez-Jimenez M, Gleeson J, Vancampfort D, Armitage CJ, Sarris J. The “online brain”: How the Internet may be changing our cognition. World Psychiatry 2019; 18(2):119-129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20617
3. Silvani MI, Werder R, Perret C. The influence of blue light on sleep, performance and wellbeing in young adults: A systematic review. Front Physiol 2022; 13:943108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.943108
4. Shechter A, Kim EW, St-Onge MP, Westwood AJ. Blocking nocturnal blue light for insomnia: A randomized controlled trial. J Psychiatr Res 2018; 96:196-202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.10.015
5. Twenge JM, Campbell WK. Associations between screen time and lower psychological well-being among children and adolescents: Evidence from a population-based study. Prev Med Rep 2018; 12:271-283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.10.003
6. Kearney BE, Lanius RA. The brain-body disconnect: A somatic sensory basis for trauma-related disorders. Front Neurosci 2022; 16:1015749. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.1015749
7. Boushra M, McDowell C. Stroke-Like Conditions. [Updated 2023 Jun 26]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK541044/
8. Goldman L, Siddiqui EM, Khan A, Jahan S, Rehman MU, Mehan S, Sharma R, Budkin S, Kumar SN, Sahu A, Kumar M, Vaibhav K. Understanding acquired brain injury: A review. Biomedicines 2022; 10(9):2167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10092167
9. Kington RS, Arnesen S, Chou WS, Curry SJ, Lazer D, Villarruel AM. Identifying credible sources of health information in social media: Principles and attributes. NAM Perspect 2021; 2021:10.31478/202107a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31478/202107a
10. Amutio-Kareaga A, García-Campayo J, Delgado LC, Hermosilla D, Martínez-Taboada C. Improving communication between physicians and their patients through mindfulness and compassion-based strategies: A narrative review. J Clin Med 2017; 6(3):33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm6030033
11. Treatment for Stimulant Use Disorders: Updated 2021 [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (US); 1999. (Treatment Improvement Protocol (TIP) Series, No. 33.) Chapter 2-How Stimulants Affect the Brain and Behavior. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK576548/
12. Pedalino F, Camerini AL. Instagram use and body dissatisfaction: The mediating role of upward social comparison with peers and influencers among young females. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19(3):1543. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031543
13. Charpentier CJ, Cogliati Dezza I, Vellani V, Globig LK, Gädeke M, Sharot T. Anxiety increases information-seeking in response to large changes. Sci Rep 2022; 12(1):7385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-10813-9
14. Caled D, Silva MJ. Digital media and misinformation: An outlook on multidisciplinary strategies against manipulation. J Comput Soc Sci 2022; 5(1):123-159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-021-00118-8
15. Demir YP, Sumer MM. Effects of smartphone overuse on headache, sleep and quality of life in migraine patients. Neurosciences (Riyadh) 2019; 24(2):115-121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17712/nsj.2019.2.20180037
16. Muppalla SK, Vuppalapati S, Reddy Pulliahgaru A, Sreenivasulu H. Effects of excessive screen time on child development: An updated review and strategies for management. Cureus 2023; 15(6):e40608. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.40608
17. Skalická V, Wold Hygen B, Stenseng F, Kårstad SB, Wichstrøm L. Screen time and the development of emotion understanding from age 4 to age 8: A community study. Br J Dev Psychol 2019; 37(3):427-443. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12283
18. Bonsaksen T, Ruffolo M, Price D, Leung J, Thygesen H, Lamph G, Kabelenga I, Geirdal AØ. Associations between social media use and loneliness in a cross-national population: do motives for social media use matter? Health Psychol Behav Med 2023; 11(1):2158089. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2022.2158089
19. Ruben MA, Stosic MD, Correale J, Blanch-Hartigan D. Is technology enhancing or hindering interpersonal communication? A framework and preliminary results to examine the relationship between technology use and nonverbal decoding skill. Front Psychol 2021; 11:611670. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.611670
20. Fabio RA, Suriano R. The influence of smartphone use on tweens’ capacity for complex critical thinking. Children (Basel) 2023; 10(4):698. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/children10040698
21. Fonzo GA. Diminished positive affect and traumatic stress: A biobehavioral review and commentary on trauma affective neuroscience. Neurobiol Stress 2018; 9:214-230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ynstr.2018.10.002
22. Kesner L, Horáček J. Empathy-related responses to depicted people in art works. Front Psychol 2017; 8:228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00228
23. Acharya S, Shukla S. Mirror neurons: Enigma of the metaphysical modular brain. J Nat Sci Biol Med 2012; 3(2):118-124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-9668.101878
24. Sugihara T, Diltz MD, Averbeck BB, Romanski LM. Integration of auditory and visual communication information in the primate ventrolateral prefrontal cortex. J Neurosci 2006; 26(43):11138-11147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3550-06.2006
25. Arnsten A, Mazure CM, Sinha R. This is your brain in meltdown. Sci Am 2012; 306(4):48-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0412-48
26. Lindsay EK, Chin B, Greco CM, Young S, Brown KW, Wright AGC, Smyth JM, Burkett D, Creswell JD. How mindfulness training promotes positive emotions: Dismantling acceptance skills training in two randomized controlled trials. J Pers Soc Psychol 2018; 115(6):944-973. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000134
27. Canadian Paediatric Society, Digital Health Task Force, Ottawa, Ontario. Digital media: Promoting healthy screen use in school-aged children and adolescents. Paediatr Child Health 2019; 24(6):402-417. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/pch/pxz095
28. Pandya A, Lodha P. Social connectedness, excessive screen time during covid-19 and mental health: A review of current evidence. Front Hum Dyn 2021; 3:684137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fhumd.2021.684137

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.