Insight into the Genetically Modified Foods: from the Concerns of Safety to Food Development (Part I)
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
Genetic engineering is the name of a process in which we add new DNA to an organism manually. The primary purpose is to add some features that are not present in the particular organism. We know that genetically modified crops can help increase the production, and food accessibility can increase multiple folds. There is a scientific concord that genetically manufactured foods presently available in the market are not harmful and are safe to be consumed. They not only increase the food production but also help in increasing the nutritional content. Although there are benefits of genetically modified foods, this technology faces a lot of controversies. Critics include consumer and health groups, importers of grain from European countries, organic farmers, scientists and environmentalists, religious groups, food advocacy groups and ethicists, politicians and traders. Some fears associated are alteration in nutritional quality of food, toxicity, antibiotic resistance, allergy and carcinogenicity. Other concerns are environmental pollution; transfer of genes to plants unintentionally, development of some viruses and toxins, some ethical as well as cultural concerns and fear of the unknown. Supporters of genetic technology are private industrialists, research scientists, a portion of users and farmers and the regulatory authorities.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Genetic Engineering, Foods, Population Health, Toxicity, Genetic Pollution
2. De Vendômois JS, Roullier F, Cellier D, Séralini GE. A comparison of the ef-fects of three GM corn varieties on mammalian health. Int J Biol Sci 2009; 5:706-726.
3. Touyz LZG. Alternate and orthodox medicine and the “odd” principle. Curr Oncol 2012; 19:64-65.
4. Ronald P. Scientific American. Guest Blog New York, NY: Scientific Ameri-can; 2011. Genetically engineered crops—what, how and why [blog entry] [Available at:https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/2011/08/11/geneticallyengineered-crops/]
5. Touyz LZG. Politics, health, and meso-thelioma: when it comes to cancer, none is one too many. Curr Oncol. 2012; 19:e374-e375.
6. Touyz LZG. Mixing drinks and con-cocting troubles. Curr Oncol 2011; 18:262-263.
7. Kloor K. No, genetically modified corn won’t give you cancer. National Post 2012; A11.
8. Southgate EM, Davey MR, Power JB, Merchant R. Factors affecting the ge-netic engineering of plants by micro-projectile bombardment. Biotechnol Adv 1995; 13:631-657.
9. ISAAA Briefs No. 37. Ithaca, NY: ISAAA; 2007. Executive summary of Global Status of Commercialised Bio-tech/GM crops: 2007.
10. Wu HX, Sparks CA, Jones HD. Char-acterization of T-DNA loci and vector backbone sequences in GM wheat produced by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Mol Breed 2006; 18:195-208.
11. Fu XD, Duc LT, Fontana S, Bong BB, Tinjuangjun P, Sudhakar D, Twyman RM, Christou P, Kohli A. Linear transgene constructs lacking vector backbone sequences generate low-copy-number GM plants with simple in-tegration patterns. Transgenic Res 2000; 9:11-19.
12. Latham JR, Wilson AK, Steinbrecher RA. The mutational consequences of plant transformation. J Biomed Biotech 2006: 2006(2):25376.
13. Pinstrup-Anderson P, Pandra-Lorch R, Rosegrant MW. World food prospects: critical issues for the early twenty-first century. 1999 Food policy report. Washington DC: International Food Policy Research Institute; 1999.
14. http://www.un.org/en/globalissues/briefingpapers/food/vitalstats.shtml
15. Byerlee D, Helsey P, Pingali PL. Real-ising yield gains for food staples in de-veloping countries in the early 21st century: prospects and challenges. In: Chang BM, Colombo M, Soronolo M, editors. Food Needs of the Developing World in the 21st Century. Vatican City: Political Academy of Sciences; 2000. pp207-pp50.
16. Christou P, Twyman RM. The potential of genetically enhanced plants to ad-dress food insecurity. Nut Research Rev 2004;17:23-42.
17. Paine JA, Shipton CA, Chaggar S, Howells RM, Kennedy MJ, Vernon G, Wright SY, Hinchliffe E, Adams JL, Sil-verstone AL, Drake R. Improving the nutritional content of Golden Rice through increased provitamin A con-tent. Nat Biotechnol 2005; 23:482-487.
18. Anderson PK, Cunningham AA, Patel NG, Morales FJ, Epstein PR, Daszak P. Emerging infectious diseases of plants: pathogen, pollution, climate change and agrotechnology drivers. Trends Eco Evol 2004; 19:535-544.
19. Peschen D, Li HP, Fischer R, Kreu-zaler F, Liao YC. Fusion protein com-prising aFusarium- specific antibody linked to antifungal peptides protect plants against a fungal pathogen. Nat Biotech 2004; 22:732-738.
20. Vinocur B, Altman A. Recent advances in engineering plant tolerance to abiot-ic stress: achievements and limitations. Curr Op Biotech 2005; 16:123-132.
21. Guidance document of the genetically modified organisms for the risk as-sessment of genetically modified plants and derived food and feed. EF-SA J 2004; 99:1-94.
22. McKeon TA. Genetically modified crops for industrial products and pro-cesses and their effects on human health. Trends Food Sci Tech 2003; 14:229-241.
23. Ewen SWB, Pusztai A. Effects of diets containing genetically modified pota-toes expressing Galanthus Nivalis lec-tin on rat small intestine. Lancet 1999;354:1353-1354.
24. Burke DM. GM Food and Crops: what went wrong in the UK? EMBO Reports 2004; 5:432-436.
25. FAO/WHO. Evaluation of Allergenicity of Genetically Modified Foods, Report of a joint FAO/WHO Expert Consulta-tion on Allergenicity of Foods derived from Biotechnology. Geneva: FAO/WHO; 2001.
26. Doerfler W, Schubbert R, Fremde DNA im Sciugersystem. Deutsches Arz-teblatt 1997; 94:51-52.
27. WHO/FAO. Strategies for assessing the safety of foods produced by bio-technology. Report of the Joint WHO/FAO Consultation. Geneva: FAO/WHO; 1991.
28. Prescott VE, Campbell PM, Moore A, Mattes J, Rothenberg ME, Foster PS, Higgins TJ, Hogan SP. Transgenic ex-pression of bean ?-amylase inhibitor in peas results in altered structure and immunogenicity. J Agric Food Chem 2005; 53:9023-9030.
29. Nordlee JA, Taylor SL, Townsend JA, Thomas LA, Bush RK. Identification of a brazil-nut allergen in GM soybeans. N Engl J Med 1996; 334:688-692.
30. Herman E. Soybean allergenicity and suppression of the immunodominant allergen. Crop Sci 2005; 45:462-467.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.