Published Mar 9, 2015

Dong Wang  


The fact that cancer cells have abnormal surface electrical charges has been discovered for more than half a century and yet it still has not been understood well despite of enormous efforts in cancerous research. Due to the lack of effective tools for the real-time measurement of electrical properties of individual live intact cells, researches for cancer cellular electricity has been plagued with much less understanding than other cellular signaling mechanisms. We herein review the major historic events of discovering the abnormal surface electrical properties of cancer cells. Although it is still difficult to fully understand this unique property of cancer cells, some applications using the unique surface electrical property of cancer cells, such as the polycation functionalized nanomaterials as the targeted anti-cancer drug delivery system and the utilization of the positively charged host defense peptides as universal anti-cancer drugs, are also reviewed. With the appearance of innovative techniques, the electrical properties of cancer cell surface can attract sufficient efforts to further understand their underlying mechanisms and implications in the clinical settings for diagnosing and treating cancer.



Cancer Cells, Surface Charge, Electrical Property, Host Defense Peptides, Cationic Liposome

1. Pekar R, Ruzicka F. Percutaneous bio-electrotherapy of cancerous tumours: A documentation of basic principles and experiences with bio-electrotherapy. ISBN: 9783851756784, Wilhelm Maudrich, 1997.

2. Szent-Györgyi A. Bioelectronics: A study in cellular regulations, defense, and cancer. ISBN: 978-1483247267, Academic Press, 1968.

3. Presman A. Electromagnetic fields and life. ISBN: 9781475706376, Springer, 1970.

4. McCaig C, Song B, Rajnicek A. Electrical dimensions in cell science. J Cell Sci 2009; 122: 4267-4276.

5. Weinberg R. The biology of cancer (2nd ed.). ISBN: 9780815342205, Garland Science, 2013.

6. Garnett M. First pulse: A personal journey in cancer research. ISBN: 9780966559712, First Pulse Projects, Inc., 2001.

7. Coman DR. Mechanisms responsible for the origin and distribution of blood-borne tumor metastases: A review. Cancer Res 1953; 13: 397-404.

8. Coman DR. Decreased mutual adhesiveness, a property of cells from squamous cell carcinomas. Cancer Res 1944; 4: 625-629.

9. Coman DR. The invasive character of cancer growth. Am J Med Sci 1946; 211: 257-260.

10. Coman DR. Mechanism of the invasiveness of cancer. Science 1947; 105: 347-348.

11. McCutcheon M, Coman DR, Moore FB. Studies on invasiveness of cancer. Adhesiveness of malignant cells in various human adenocarcinomas. Cancer 1948; 1: 460-467.

12. Abercrombie M, Heaysman JE. Observations on the social behaviour of cells in tissue culture: I. Speed of movement of chick heart fibroblasts in relation to their mutual contacts. Exp Cell Res 1953; 5: 111-131.

13. Abercrombie M, Heaysman J, Karthauser H. Social behaviour of cells in tissue culture: III. Mutual influence of sarcoma cells and fibroblasts. Exp Cell Res 1957; 13: 276-291.

14. Pardee AB. The surface membrane as a regulator of animal cell division. In Vitro 1971; 7: 95-104.

15. Holley RW. A unifying hypothesis concerning the nature of malignant growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1972; 69: 2840-2841.

16. Cook G, Heard D, Seaman G. The electrokinetic characterization of the Ehrlich ascites carcinoma cell. Exp Cell Res 1962; 28: 27-39.

17. Nir S, Andersen M. Van der Waals interactions between cell surfaces. J Membr Biol 1977; 31: 1-18.

18. Ambrose E, Am James JL. Differences between the electrical charge carried by normal and homologous tumour cells. Nature 1956; 177: 576-577.

19. Purdom L, Ambrose E. A correlation between electrical surface charge and some biological characteristics during the stepwise progression of a mouse sarcoma. Nature 1958; 181: 1586-1587.

20. Hirono I. Ameboid motility of the ascites hepatoma cells and its significance for their invasiveness and metastatic spread. Cancer Res 1958; 18: 1345-1349.

21. Heard D, Seaman G, Simon-Reuss I. Electrophoretic mobility of cultured mesodermal tissue cells. Nature 1961; 190: 1009.

22. Ambrose E, Easty DM, Jones P. Specific reactions of polyelectrolytes with the surfaces of normal and tumour cells. Br J Cancer 1958; 12: 439.

23. Moroson H. Polycation-treated tumor cells in vivo and in vitro. Cancer Res. 1971; 31: 373-380.

24. Richardson T, Hodgett J, Lindner A, Stahmann M. Action of polylysine on some ascites tumors in mice. Exp Biol Med 1959; 101: 382-386.

25. Thorling E, Larsen B, Nielsen H. Inhibitory effect of DEAE-Dextran on tumour growth. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand Sect A 1971; 79: 81-90.

26. Vorobyev V, Bresler V. Unfractionated preparations of histones from normal mammalian tissues as agents inhibiting growth of transplanting tumours. Nature 1963; 198: 545-547.

27. Mehrishi J. Effect of lysine polypeptides on the surface charge of normal and cancer cells. Eur J Cancer 1969; 5: 427-435.

28. Weiss L, Zeigel R. Cell surface negativity and the binding of positively charged particles. J Cell Physiol 1971; 77: 179-185.

29. Weiss L, Subjeck J. The densities of colloidal iron hydroxide particles bound to microvilli and the spaces between them: Studies on glutaraldehyde-fixed Ehrlich ascites tumour cells. J Cell Sci 1974; 14: 215-223.

30. Marikovsky Y, Ben-Bassat H, Leibovich S, Cividalli L, Fischler H, Danon D. Surface charge characteristics of cells from malignant cell lines and normal cell lines of the human hematopoietic system. J Natl Cancer Inst 1979; 62: 285-292.

31. Vance JE, Steenbergen R. Metabolism and functions of phosphatidylserine. Prog Lipid Res 2005; 44: 207-234.

32. Rambourg A, Leblond C. Electron microscope observations on the carbohydrate-rich cell coat present at the surface of cells in the rat. J Cell Biol 1967; 32: 27-53.

33. Forrester J, Ambrose E, Macpherson J. Electrophoretic investigations of a clone of hamster fibroblasts and polyoma-transformed cells from the same population. Nature 1962; 196: 1068-1070.

34. Barker S, Stacey M, Tipper D, Kirkham J. Some observations on certain mucoproteins containing neuraminic acid. Nature 1959; 184: 68-69.

35. Mabry E, Carubelli R. Sialic acid in human cancer. Experientia 1972; 28: 182-183.

36. Risso A, Zanetti M, Gennaro R. Cytotoxicity and apoptosis mediated by two peptides of innate immunity. Cell Immunol 1998; 189: 107-115.

37. Zwaal RF, Schroit AJ. Pathophysiologic implications of membrane phospholipid asymmetry in blood cells. Blood 1997; 89: 1121-1132.

38. Fadok VA, Voelker DR, Campbell PA, Cohen JJ, Bratton DL, Henson PM. Exposure of phosphatidylserine on the surface of apoptotic lymphocytes triggers specific recognition and removal by macrophages. J Immunol 1992; 148: 2207-2216.

39. Zwaal R, Comfurius P, Bevers E. Surface exposure of phosphatidylserine in pathological cells. Cell Mol Life Sci 2005; 62: 971-988.

40. Narayanan S. Sialic acid as a tumor marker. Ann Clin Lab Sci 1994; 24: 376-384.

41. Kalela A, Ponnio M, Koivu T, Hoyhtya M, Huhtala H, Sillanaukee P, Nikkari S. Association of serum sialic acid and MMP-9 with lipids and inflammatory markers. Eur J Clin Invest 2000; 30: 99-104.

42. Dyatlovitskaya E, Bezuglov V, Lipids as bioeffectors. Introduction. Biochemistry (Moscow) 1998; 63: 1-3.

43. Kagan T, Lidak MY, Meyrena D, Simkhovich B. Search for antitumor agents among synthetic polycations (survey). Pharm Chem J 1988; 22: 413-421.

44. Cook G., Jacobson W. The electrophoretic mobility of normal and leukaemic cells of mice. Biochem J 1968; 107: 549-557.

45. Kojima K, Maekawa A. Difference in electrokinetic charge of cells between two cell types of ascites hepatoma after removal of sialic acid. Cancer Res 1970; 30: 2858-2862.

46. Hiraki J, Ichikawa T, Ninomiya S, Seki H, Uohama K, Seki H, Kimura S, Yanagimoto Y, Barnett Jr JW. Use of ADME studies to confirm the safety of ?-polylysine as a preservative in food. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2003; 37: 328-340.

47. Shima S, Matsuoka H, Iwamoto T, Sakai H. Antimicrobial action of epsilon-poly-L-lysine. J Antibiot 1984; 37: 1449-1455.

48. Shah VC, Reilly P. Effect of histones, other basic proteins and some antibiotics on the transplantability of mouse mammary tumours. Nature 1967; 213: 403-404.

49. Arnold L, Dagan A, Gutheil J, Kaplan N. Antineoplastic activity of poly (L-lysine) with some ascites tumor cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1979; 76: 3246-3250.

50. Kornguth S, Stahmann M, Anderson J. Effect of polylysine on the cytology of Ehrlich ascites tumor cells. Exp Cell Res 1961; 24: 484-494.

51. Al-Jamal KT, Akerman S, Podesta JE, Yilmazer A, Turton JA, Bianco A, Vargesson N, Kanthou C, Florence AT, Tozer GM. Systemic antiangiogenic activity of cationic poly-L-lysine dendrimer delays tumor growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010; 107: 3966-3971.

52. Al-Jamal KT, Al-Jamal WT, Wang JTW, Rubio N, Buddle J, Gathercole D, Zloh M, Kostarelos K, Cationic poly-l-lysine dendrimer complexes doxorubicin and delays tumor growth in vitro and in vivo. ACS Nano 2013; 7: 1905-1917.

53. Bangham A, Standish MM, Watkins J. Diffusion of univalent ions across the lamellae of swollen phospholipids. J Mol Biol 1965; 13: 238-252.

54. Felgner PL, Gadek TR, Holm M, Roman R, Chan HW, Wenz M, Northrop JP, Ringold G M, Danielsen M. Lipofection: a highly efficient, lipid-mediated DNA-transfection procedure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1987; 84: 7413-7417.

55. Miller AD. Cationic liposomes for gene therapy. Angew Chem Int Ed 1998; 37: 1768-1785.

56. Folkman J. Tumor angiogenesis: Therapeutic implications. N Engl J Med 1971; 285: 1182-1186.

57. Krasnici S, Werner A, Eichhorn ME, Schmitt-Sody M, Pahernik SA, Sauer B, Schulze B, Teifel M, Michaelis U, Naujoks K. Effect of the surface charge of liposomes on their uptake by angiogenic tumor vessels. Int J Cancer 2003; 105: 561-567.

58. Thurston G, McLean JW, Rizen M, Baluk P, Haskell A, Murphy TJ, Hanahan D, McDonald DM. Cationic liposomes target angiogenic endothelial cells in tumors and chronic inflammation in mice. J Clin Invest 1998; 101: 1401-1413.

59. Nomura T, Koreeda N, Yamashita F, Takakura Y, Hashida M. Effect of particle size and charge on the disposition of lipid carriers after intratumoral injection into tissue-isolated tumors. Pharm Res 1998; 15: 128-132.

60. Campbell RB, Fukumura D, Brown EB, Mazzola LM, Izumi Y, Jain RK, Torchilin VP, Munn LL. Cationic charge determines the distribution of liposomes between the vascular and extravascular compartments of tumors. Cancer Res 2002; 62: 6831-6836.

61. Abu Lila AS, Kizuki S, Doi Y, Suzuki T, Ishida T, Kiwada H. Oxaliplatin encapsulated in PEG-coated cationic liposomes induces significant tumor growth suppression via a dual-targeting approach in a murine solid tumor model. J Controlled Release 2009; 137: 8-14.

62. Schmitt-Sody M, Strieth S, Krasnici S, Sauer B, Schulze B, Teifel M, Michaelis U, Naujoks K, Dellian M. Neovascular targeting therapy paclitaxel encapsulated in cationic liposomes improves antitumoral efficacy. Clin Cancer Res 2003; 9: 2335-2341.

63. Kunstfeld R, Wickenhauser G, Michaelis U, Teifel M, Umek W, Naujoks K, Wolff K, Petzelbauer P. Paclitaxel encapsulated in cationic liposomes diminishes tumor angiogenesis and melanoma growth in a “humanized” SCID mouse model. J Invest Dermatol 2003; 120: 476-482.

64. Barenholz YC. Doxil®-the first FDA-approved nano-drug: Lessons learned. J Controlled Release 2012; 160: 117-134.

65. Zhang Q, Huang XE, Gao LL. A clinical study on the premedication of paclitaxel liposome in the treatment of solid tumors. Biomed Pharmacother 2009; 63: 603-607.

66. Hancock RE, Lehrer R, Cationic peptides: a new source of antibiotics. Trends Biotechnol 1998; 16: 82-88.

67. Zasloff M. Antimicrobial peptides of multicellular organisms. Nature 2002; 415: 389-395.

68. Powers JPS, Hancock RE. The relationship between peptide structure and antibacterial activity. Peptides 2003; 24: 1681-1691.

69. Rosenfeld Y, Shai Y. Lipopolysaccharide (Endotoxin)-host defense antibacterial peptides interactions: role in bacterial resistance and prevention of sepsis. Biochim Biophys Acta 2006; 1758: 1513-1522.

70. Wang G, Li X, Wang Z. APD2: the updated antimicrobial peptide database and its application in peptide design. Nucleic Acids Res 2009; 37: D933-D937.

71. Papo N, Shai Y. Host defense peptides as new weapons in cancer treatment. Cell Mol Life Sci 2005; 62: 784-790.

72. Zasloff M, Martin B, Chen HC. Antimicrobial activity of synthetic magainin peptides and several analogues. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1988; 85: 910-913.

73. Huang C, Chen H, Zierdt C. Magainin analogs effective against pathogenic protozoa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1990; 34: 1824-1826.

74. Chen HC, Brown JH, Morell JL, Huang C. Synthetic magainin analogues with improved antimicrobial activity. FEBS Lett 1988; 236: 462-466.

75. Cruciani RA, Barker JL, Zasloff M, Chen HC, Colamonici O. Antibiotic magainins exert cytolytic activity against transformed cell lines through channel formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1991; 88: 3792-3796.

76. Ohsaki Y, Gazdar AF, Chen HC, Johnson BE. Antitumor activity of magainin analogues against human lung cancer cell lines. Cancer Res 1992; 52: 3534-3538.

77. Baker MA, Maloy WL, Zasloff M, Jacob LS. Anticancer efficacy of Magainin2 and analogue peptides. Cancer Res 1993; 53: 3052-3057.

78. Papo N, Shai Y. New lytic peptides based on the D, L-amphipathic helix motif preferentially kill tumor cells compared to normal cells. Biochemistry 2003; 42: 9346-9354.

79. Papo N, Shahar M, Eisenbach L, Shai Y. A novel lytic peptide composed of DL-amino acids selectively kills cancer cells in culture and in mice. J Biol Chem 2003; 278: 21018-21023.

80. Papo N, Braunstein A, Eshhar Z, Shai Y. Suppression of human prostate tumor growth in mice by a cytolytic d-, l-amino acid peptide membrane lysis, increased necrosis, and inhibition of prostate-specific antigen secretion. Cancer Res 2004; 64: 5779-5786.

81. Mader JS, Hoskin DW. Cationic antimicrobial peptides as novel cytotoxic agents for cancer treatment. Expert Opin Invest Drugs 2006; 15: 933-946.

82. Hoskin DW, Ramamoorthy A. Studies on anticancer activities of antimicrobial peptides. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr 2008; 1778: 357-375.

83. Wang W, Wang D. Granulocyte therapy for cancer. Sci Insights 2013; 2: 43-44.

84. Cui Z, Willingham MC, Hicks AM, Alexander-Miller MA, Howard TD, Hawkins GA, Miller MS, Weir HM, Du W, DeLong CJ. Spontaneous regression of advanced cancer: identification of a unique genetically determined, age-dependent trait in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100: 6682-6687.

85. Hicks AM, Riedlinger G, Willingham MC, Alexander-Miller MA, Von Kap-Herr C, Pettenati MJ, Sanders AM, Weir HM, Du W, Kim J, Simpson AJG, Old LJ, Cui Z. Transferable anticancer innate immunity in spontaneous regression/complete resistance mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103: 7753-7758.

86. Riedlinger G, Adams J, Stehle JR, Blanks MJ, Sanders AM, Hicks AM, Willingham MC, Cui Z. The spectrum of resistance in SR/CR mice: the critical role of chemoattraction in the cancer/leukocyte interaction. BMC Cancer 2010; 10: 179.

87. Koch J, Hau J, Christensen JP, Jensen HE, Hansen MB, Rieneck K. Immune cells from SR/CR mice induce the regression of established tumors in BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice. PloS one 2013; 8: e59995.

88. Wang D, Wang W, Ren L. Granulocyte therapy for cancer: A prospective review. Sci Insights 2014; 7: 139-143.

89. Mack KD, Wei R, Elbagarri A, Abbey N, McGrath MS. A novel method for DEAE-dextran mediated transfection of adherent primary cultured human macrophages. J Immunol Methods 1998; 211: 79-86.

90. Kaplan JM, Pennington SE, George JAS, Woodworth LA, Fasbender A, Marshall J, Cheng SH, Wadsworth SC, Gregory RJ, Smith AE. Potentiation of gene transfer to the mouse lung by complexes of adenovirus vector and polycations improves therapeutic potential. Hum Gene Ther 1998; 9: 1469-1479.

91. Fiala M, Saltzman B. Enhancement of the infectivity of rhinovirus ribonucleic acid by diethylaminoethyl dextran. Appl Microbiol 1969; 17: 190-191.

92. Thorling E, Larsen B, Nielsen H. Inhibitory effect of Deae-Dextran on tumour growth. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand Sect A 1971; 79: 81-90.
How to Cite
Wang, D. (2015). Historical and Practical Perspective of the Unique Surface Electrical Properties of Cancer Cells. Science Insights, 11(3), 346–354. https://doi.org/10.15354/si.14.re102