##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Aug 29, 2024

Alan C.K. Cheung  

Abstract

Principal leadership evaluation and assessment, one of the crucial means for managing and monitoring principals, is of vital significance for principal professional development, the enhancement of principal leadership capability, the optimization of the principal accountability system, and school improvement (Wang, 2016; Han, 2019). At the level of personal growth, principal leadership assessment can provide school leaders with formative and summative feedback, which is beneficial for their professional development (Murphy et al., 2011). At the level of school management, it helps the principal identify the gaps between the existing practices and expected outcomes to make informed decisions for school improvement and development (Goldring et al., 2009); in the meantime, principal leadership assessment with definite results enables other school administrators to understand clearly the goals set for the school and principal, contributing to the development of a climate of collective accountability (Murphy et al., 2011) and the improvement of school governance. Overall, well-designed and properly implemented principal leadership assessment can effectively enhance organizational performance and help select qualified school leaders (Murphy et al., 2011).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Leadership

References
Brown, G. T. & Chai, C. (2012). Assessing instructional leadership: A longitudinal study of new prin-cipals. Journal of Educational Administration, 50(6):753-772. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1108/09578231211264676

Burkett, J. (2020). Ineffective campus leadership: Why teachers leave bad principals. Journal of Ac-ademic Perspectives. 2020(4).

Chen, X. & Chen, H. (2024). Essential elements of principal leadership: A literature review of leadership qualities of primary and secondary principals. Science Insights Education Frontiers, 23(2):3811-3825. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15354/sief.24.re392

Donaldson, S. I. & Grant-Vallone, E. J. (2002). Understanding self-report bias in organizational be-havior research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17(02): 245-260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019637632584

Goldring, E., Cravens, X. C., Murphy, J., Porter, A. C., Elliott, S. N., & Carson, B. (2009). The evalua-tion of principals: What and how do states and urban districts assess leadership? The Elemen-tary School Journal, 110(1):19-39. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/598841

Hallinger, P. (2003). Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3):329-351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764032000122005

Hallinger, P. & Murphy, J. (1985) Assessing the Instructional Management Behaviour of Principals. The Elementary School Journal, 86:217-247. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1086/461445

Han, Y. (2019). Principal leadership evaluation research: The current state and new prospects. Edu-cation Modernization, 6(58):180-181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16541/j.cnki. 2095-8420.2019.58.083

Murphy, J., Goldring, E., Elliott, S., Cravens, X., & Porter, A. (2011). Vanderbilt assessment of leader-ship in education: A learning-centered assessment approach. Journal of East China Normal University (Education Science Edition), 2011(1):1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2011.01.008

Porter, A., Goldring, E., Elliott, S., Murphy, J., Polikoff, M., & Cravens, X. (2008). Setting Perfor-mance Standards for the VAL-ED: Assessment of Principal Leadership. Online Submission.

Wang, J. (2016). A professional standards-based principal leadership evaluation framework. Re-search in Educational Development, 2016(4):64-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14121/j.cnki.1008-3855.2016.04.012
How to Cite
Cheung, A. C. (2024). Developing Principal Leadership Assessment Instruments: The Necessity and Challenges. Science Insights Education Frontiers, 23(2), 3729–3731. https://doi.org/10.15354/sief.24.co338
Section
Commentary