Can Artificial Intelligence Only be a Helper Writer for Science?
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Published
Jan 30, 2024
Abstract
The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) has brought about a profound transformation in numerous areas, including the field of science writing. With the rising complexity and data-driven nature of scientific research, effective communication of findings and ideas becomes ever more vital. AI has become a potent technology that may aid in producing scientific material, conducting data analysis, and optimizing literature reviews. Nevertheless, it is crucial to acknowledge the constraints of AI in generating scientific material and to comprehend its optimal integration with human expertise. We herein prospectively examined the role of AI in science writing, discussing its possible advantages and difficulties, and emphasizing the significance of upholding human subjectivity in this developing field.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Keywords
Artificial Intelligence, Scientific Writing, Critical Thinking, Data, Assistance
References
1. Serpa S, Ferreira CM, Santos AIS, Cheng X, Cheung ACK, Zhou L, Sá MJ, Pellegrini M, Wang F. Future of scholarly publishing: A perspective. Sci Insights 2021; 39(3):353-360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15354/si.21.re239
2. Serpa S, Ferreira CM, Santos AI. Personal argumentation in the scholarly publication. J Educ Soc Res 2020; 10(2):1-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3 6941/jesr-2020-0021
3. Ritz T. Intelligence or artificial intelligence? More hard problems for authors of Biological Psychology, the neurosciences, and everyone else. Biol Psychol 2023; 181:108590. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2023.108590
4. Sá MJ, Ferreira CM, Santos AI, Serpa S. Publishing at any cost? The need for the improvement of the quality of scholarly publications. Int J Higher Educ 2020; 9(3):214-221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n3p214
5. Serpa S, Santos AI. Artificial intelligence and higher education. International Conference on Research in Education and Science (ICRES) – Proceedings Book. In press. May 18-21, 2023, Cappadocia – Nevsehir, TURKIYE. ISTES Organisation.
6. Sá MJ, Serpa S. Metaverse as a learning environment: Some considerations. Sustainability 2023; 15(3):2186, 1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032186
7. Polonsky MJ, Rotman JD. Should artificial intelligent agents be your co-author? Arguments in favour, informed by ChatGPT. Australas Mark J 2023; 31(2):91-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582231167882
8. Aziz A. Artificial intelligence produced original work: A new approach to copyright protection and ownership. Eur J Artif Intel Mach Learn 2023; 2(2):9-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24018/ejai.2023.2.2.15
9. Balat A, Bahşi İ. May artificial intelligence be a co-author on an academic paper? Eur J Therap 2023; 2023:e12-e13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58600/eurjther1688
10. Hosseini M, Resnik DB, Holmes K. The ethics of disclosing the use of artificial intelligence tools in writing scholarly manuscripts. Res Ethics 2023; 19(4):449-465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161231180449
11. Solomon DH, Allen KD, Katz P, Sawalha AH, Yelin E. ChatGPT, et al. Artificial intelligence, authorship, and medical publishing. Arthr Rheumatol 2023; 75(6):867-868. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.42497
12. Oduoye MOO, Javed B, Gupta N, Valentina Sih CM. Algorithmic bias and research integrity; the role of non-human authors in shaping scientific knowledge with respect to Artificial Intelligence (AI); a perspective. Int J Surg 2023; 109(10):2987-2990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/js9.0000000000000552
13. Balmer A. A sociological conversation with ChatGPT about AI ethics, affect and reflexivity. Sociology 2023; 2023:003803852311696. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385231169676
14. Strzelecki A. To use or not to use ChatGPT in higher education? A study of students’ acceptance and use of technology. Interact Learn Envir 2023; 2023:1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2209881
15. Lee JY. Can an artificial intelligence chatbot be the author of a scholarly article? Sci Edit 2023; 10(1):7-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.292
16. Google. Bard. A conversational AI tool by Google. Last accessed: August 10, 2023. Available at: https://bard.google.com/
17. Santos AI, Ferreira CM, Serpa S. Writing in science. J Educ Soc Res 2020; 10(4):128-133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2020-0072
18. COPE. Authorship and AI tools. Last accessed: August 10, 2023. Available at: https://publicationethics.org/cope-position-statements/ai-author
19. Ferreira CM, Serpa S. Publicising the identified peer-reviewer: Legitimacy and quality of the scientific publication. Int J Interdiscipl Educ Stud 2018; 13(1):11-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-011x/cgp/v13i01/11-17
20. Van Gelder RN. The pros and cons of artificial intelligence authorship in ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 2023; 130(7):670-671. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2023.05.018
21. Serpa S, Ferreira CM, Santos AI. Fostering interdisciplinarity: Implications for social sciences. Int J Soc Sci Stud 2017; 5(12):44-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11114/ijsss.v5i12.2775
22. Santos AI, Ferreira CM, Serpa S, Sá MJ. What is an internship report? Contributions to the construction of its meaning. J Educ e-Learn Res 2020; 7(1):1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2020.71.1.6
23. Ferreira CM, Serpa S. Contemporary challenges for the academic. Int J Contemp Educ 2018; 2(1):1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11114/ijce.v2i1.3786
2. Serpa S, Ferreira CM, Santos AI. Personal argumentation in the scholarly publication. J Educ Soc Res 2020; 10(2):1-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3 6941/jesr-2020-0021
3. Ritz T. Intelligence or artificial intelligence? More hard problems for authors of Biological Psychology, the neurosciences, and everyone else. Biol Psychol 2023; 181:108590. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2023.108590
4. Sá MJ, Ferreira CM, Santos AI, Serpa S. Publishing at any cost? The need for the improvement of the quality of scholarly publications. Int J Higher Educ 2020; 9(3):214-221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n3p214
5. Serpa S, Santos AI. Artificial intelligence and higher education. International Conference on Research in Education and Science (ICRES) – Proceedings Book. In press. May 18-21, 2023, Cappadocia – Nevsehir, TURKIYE. ISTES Organisation.
6. Sá MJ, Serpa S. Metaverse as a learning environment: Some considerations. Sustainability 2023; 15(3):2186, 1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032186
7. Polonsky MJ, Rotman JD. Should artificial intelligent agents be your co-author? Arguments in favour, informed by ChatGPT. Australas Mark J 2023; 31(2):91-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582231167882
8. Aziz A. Artificial intelligence produced original work: A new approach to copyright protection and ownership. Eur J Artif Intel Mach Learn 2023; 2(2):9-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24018/ejai.2023.2.2.15
9. Balat A, Bahşi İ. May artificial intelligence be a co-author on an academic paper? Eur J Therap 2023; 2023:e12-e13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58600/eurjther1688
10. Hosseini M, Resnik DB, Holmes K. The ethics of disclosing the use of artificial intelligence tools in writing scholarly manuscripts. Res Ethics 2023; 19(4):449-465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161231180449
11. Solomon DH, Allen KD, Katz P, Sawalha AH, Yelin E. ChatGPT, et al. Artificial intelligence, authorship, and medical publishing. Arthr Rheumatol 2023; 75(6):867-868. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.42497
12. Oduoye MOO, Javed B, Gupta N, Valentina Sih CM. Algorithmic bias and research integrity; the role of non-human authors in shaping scientific knowledge with respect to Artificial Intelligence (AI); a perspective. Int J Surg 2023; 109(10):2987-2990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/js9.0000000000000552
13. Balmer A. A sociological conversation with ChatGPT about AI ethics, affect and reflexivity. Sociology 2023; 2023:003803852311696. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385231169676
14. Strzelecki A. To use or not to use ChatGPT in higher education? A study of students’ acceptance and use of technology. Interact Learn Envir 2023; 2023:1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2209881
15. Lee JY. Can an artificial intelligence chatbot be the author of a scholarly article? Sci Edit 2023; 10(1):7-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.292
16. Google. Bard. A conversational AI tool by Google. Last accessed: August 10, 2023. Available at: https://bard.google.com/
17. Santos AI, Ferreira CM, Serpa S. Writing in science. J Educ Soc Res 2020; 10(4):128-133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2020-0072
18. COPE. Authorship and AI tools. Last accessed: August 10, 2023. Available at: https://publicationethics.org/cope-position-statements/ai-author
19. Ferreira CM, Serpa S. Publicising the identified peer-reviewer: Legitimacy and quality of the scientific publication. Int J Interdiscipl Educ Stud 2018; 13(1):11-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-011x/cgp/v13i01/11-17
20. Van Gelder RN. The pros and cons of artificial intelligence authorship in ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 2023; 130(7):670-671. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2023.05.018
21. Serpa S, Ferreira CM, Santos AI. Fostering interdisciplinarity: Implications for social sciences. Int J Soc Sci Stud 2017; 5(12):44-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11114/ijsss.v5i12.2775
22. Santos AI, Ferreira CM, Serpa S, Sá MJ. What is an internship report? Contributions to the construction of its meaning. J Educ e-Learn Res 2020; 7(1):1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2020.71.1.6
23. Ferreira CM, Serpa S. Contemporary challenges for the academic. Int J Contemp Educ 2018; 2(1):1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11114/ijce.v2i1.3786
How to Cite
Gupta, B. P. (2024). Can Artificial Intelligence Only be a Helper Writer for Science?. Science Insights, 44(1), 1221–1227. https://doi.org/10.15354/si.24.re872
Issue
Section
Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.