The Formation of Forearc Seismic Belt: A Potential Explanation of Seismogenesis in a Weakly Coupled Subduction Zone
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
The enigmatic occurrence of seismic activity in forearc regions, particularly within weakly coupled subduction zones, continues to perplex geoscientists. While traditional models of plate interface coupling explain many megathrust earthquakes, they fall short in accounting for the spatial distribution and mechanism of intermediate-magnitude earthquakes within the forearc crust. This opinion article explores the formation of the forearc seismic belt (FSB) as a plausible and coherent framework for understanding seismogenesis in such settings. Drawing from geophysical observations, recent advances in subduction zone modeling, and tectonic analogs, the article argues that the FSB emerges as a structural and stress-response feature linked to lower plate geometry, fluid fluxing, and crustal heterogeneities in the overriding plate. This perspective challenges the narrow view that only strongly coupled megathrust interfaces are responsible for major seismicity and proposes that crustal adaptation to slab dynamics plays a more active role. Recognizing the FSB’s role could refine seismic hazard assessments in subduction zones previously thought to be relatively quiescent.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Forearc Seismic Belt, Seismogenesis, Forearc Crust, Subduction Zone, Earthquakes
No funding source declared.
Cruikshank, K. M., & Peterson, C. D. (2019). Cascadia Convergent Zone: An example of primary convergent seismogenic structure. Open Journal of Earthquake Re-search, 08(02), 132–164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ojer.2019.82009
Dobretsov, N., Koulakov, I., & Polyansky, O. (2013). Geodynam-ics and stress–strain patterns in different tectonic settings. Russian Geology and Geophysics, 54(4), 357–380. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rgg.2013.03.001
Fisher, D. M., Hooker, J. N., Smye, A. J., & Chen, T. (2021). Insights from the geological record of de-formation along the subduction interface at depths of seismogen-esis. Geosphere, 17(6), 1686–1703. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1130/ges02389.1
Gardonio, B., Marsan, D., Bodin, T., Socquet, A., Durand, S., Radiguet, M., Ricard, Y., & Schubnel, A. (2024). Change of deep subduction seismicity after a large megathrust earthquake. Nature Communica-tions, 15(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-43935-3
Menant, A., Angiboust, S., & Gerya, T. (2019). Stress-driven fluid flow controls long-term megathrust strength and deep accretionary dynamics. Scientific Reports, 9(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46191-y
Nuyen, C., & Schmidt, D. (2024). Along-strike changes in ETS be-havior near the slab edge of Southern Cascadia. Seismica, 2(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.26443/seismica.v2i4.1097
Oryan, B., Olive, J., Jolivet, R., Malatesta, L. C., Gailleton, B., & Bruhat, L. (2024). Megathrust locking encoded in subduction landscapes. Science Advances, 10(17). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adl4286
Plata‐Martinez, R., Iinuma, T., Tomita, F., Nakamura, Y., Nishi-mura, T., & Hori, T. (2024). Revis-iting slip deficit rates and its insights into large and slow earthquakes at the Nankai subduction zone. Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth, 129(12). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2023jb027942
Umeda, K., Yamazaki, Y., & Sumino, H. (2024). Geochemical signature of deep fluids triggering earthquake swarm in the Noto peninsula, cen-tral Japan. Geophysical Research Letters, 51(13). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2024gl108581
Zaccagnino, D., Telesca, L., Tan, O., & Doglioni, C. (2023). Clustering Analysis of Seismicity in the Ana-tolian Region with Implications for Seismic Hazard. Entropy, 25(6), 835. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/e25060835
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.