Can Information Technology Promote Academic Performance of School-aged Children? An Empirical Study Based on CEPS
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
It is inconclusive whether the information technology can promote academic performance of school-aged children. Based on the China Education Panel Survey data provided by the NSRC, we used the method of quasi-experimental of propensity score matching to discuss the net effect of information technology on academic achievements. We found that: i) A significant difference existed in the academic performance between urban and rural school-aged children. The urban students were superior to those from the rural areas, whereas no positive correlation was found between the educational level and family economic condition; ii) Family human capital stock and family size (single child families) were positively correlated with internet usage, but the academic pressure reduced the probability of family Internet usage; iii) PSM revealed the negative impact of information technology on students’ achievements when stratified into urban versus rural, and poverty versus non-poverty. The improvement of Chinese and English was realized indirectly by changing reading habits, while mathematics was directly by taking effective learning time. Our findings implied that a three-party linkage among the government, the school, and the family is required to emphasize the instrumental rationality of the information technology, promote the formation of the Internet learning preference, and support the development of the information technology hardware.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Information Technology, Academic Achievement, Propensity Score Matching, Internet Preference
Chen, C.J. & Gu, X.Q. (2017) The impact of information technology on students’ literacy: a perspective on education informatization. Open Edu Res, 3:37-49.
Chen, C.J. & Zhi, T.J. (2016)The impact of information technology on students’ digital reading achievement: evidence from PISA. Open Edu Res, 4:57-70.
Chen, Q.L. & Zhang, W.H. (2016) Digital divide and students’ academic performance – a study based on the data from PISA2012 Shanghai. Youth Res, 3:49-56.
Dimaggio, P. & Hargittai, E. (2001). From the “digital divide” to “digital inequality”. Working paper series NO.15 Princeton University.
Fang, C. &Huang, B. (2018) Influence of human capital investment on children’s academic achievement-analysis of multilevel liner model based on CEPS tracking data. J Anhui Nor Univ (Hum. & Soc. Sci.), 2:116-124.
Golder, S.A. &Mary, M.W. (2014) Digital footprints: opportunities and challenges for online social research. Annual Review of Sociology, 40(1):129-152.
Gu, X.Q., Wang, C.L. &Wang, F. (2017) Historical mission and roles of ICT in educational reform in the past 20 years. E-Edu Res, 6:9-19.
Hanushek, E.A. (1992) The Trade-off between Child Quantity and Quality. J Pol Eco, 100(1):84-117.
Li, L., Zhao, W.L. &Bian, W.J. (2017) Family background the non-cognitive skills. Dongyue Tribune, 1:45-52.
Liu, X.R., Ren, Q., Li, F. & Zhao, J. (2018) Entering a new era: history achievement, challenges and reform strategies of information technology education in elementary and middle schools of China. Modern Edu Tech, 6:17-24.
OECD. (2015) Students, computers and learning: making the connection. Paris: OECS Publishing.
Rosenbaum, P.R. & Rubin, D.B. (1985) Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. Am Statistician, 24(4):521-544.
Wang, H.M., Wu, Y.X. & Huang, C. (2017) Family socioeconomic status, preschool education and adolescents’ cognitive & non-cognitive abilities. Youth Res, 6:46-57+92.
Xin, T. & Zou, D. (2010) The impact of computer use in class on junior high school students’ math achievement. J Edu Stud, 4:65-70.
Yang, P. & Xu, Y. (2017) Digital divide and inequality in household investment. Peking Univ Edu Rev, 4:126-154.
Yang, Z.C. (2018) The intermediary factors of family background affects the students’ development. Chin EcoN Edu Rev, 3:61-82.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.