The Effect on Gifted Students’ 21st-Century Skills of Supporting Science Teaching with LEGO® Education® BricQ Motion Essential and Student Opinions on this Instruction
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Published
Apr 29, 2023
Abstract
In many countries, individuals have started to gain 21st-century skills from an early age. In Turkey, the education of gifted students is supported with activities enriched in parallel with these skills in science and art centres. The LEGO® Education® BricQ Motion Essential Set reinforces achievements with hands-on activities in science subjects, while also improving 21st-century skills such as problem solving, critical thinking, creativity, and collaboration. At this point, this study aims to examine the effect of the LEGO® Education® BricQ Motion Essential Set on the 21st-century skills of gifted students in the teaching of the ‘Force and Motion’ unit and to determine the students’ views on the teaching process. The study was carried out in a science and art centre in Konya in the spring term of the 2021–2022 academic year. The sample of the study consisted of 21 gifted students studying in Support-2 programmes (4th grade). An explanatory sequential design was preferred in the study. In the quantitative data collection phase of the study, a one-group pre-test/post-test experimental design was used. Interviews were used for the qualitative data collection phase. The quantitative data of the research were analysed with the SPSS 26 statistical package program. Qualitative data were categorised according to themes and codes in accordance with content analysis. The results of the research showed that the LEGO® Education® BricQ Motion Essential Set was effective for 21st-century learning and the renewal of the skills of the gifted students participating in the research and that the students developed positive opinions about this education set. It is recommended to use LEGO® training sets to develop the 21st-century skills of gifted students.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Keywords
21st-Century Skills, Science Teaching, Force–Motion, LEGO®, Gifted Student
Supporting Agencies
This study was carried out within the scope of the SDK-2021-7250 project supported by the Gazi University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit.
References
Açışlı Çelik, S. (2022). STEM etkinliklerinin ortaokul 6. sınıf öğrencilerinin problem çözme becerilerine, eleştirel düşünmelerine ve STEM’e yönelik tutumlarına etkisinin araştırılması [Investigation of the effects of STEM activities on middle school 6th grade students’ problem solving skills, critical thinking and attitudes towards STEM]. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 56:287-313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9779.pauefd.1054678
Atmatzidou, S., Demetriadis, S., & Nika, P. (2018). How does the degree of guidance support students’ metacognitive and problem solving skills in educational robotics? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27(1):70-85. DOI: https://10.1007/s10956-017-9709-x
Bender, W.N. (2018). STEM öğretimi için 20 strateji [20 strategies for STEM teaching]. S. Durmuş, A.S. İpek ve B. Yıldız (Çev.). Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
Benek, İ. (2019). Sosyobı̇lı̇msel STEM etkı̇nlı̇klerı̇nı̇n öğrencı̇lerı̇n tutumlarına ve 21. yüzyıl becerı̇lerı̇ne etkı̇sı̇nı̇n ı̇ncelenmesı̇ [Examination of the impact of sociological STEM activities on students’ attitudes and 21st century skills]. Ph.D. diss., İstanbul Ünı̇versı̇tesı̇, Cerrahpaşa Lı̇sansüstü Eğı̇tı̇m Enstı̇tüsü, İstanbul.
Bircan, M. A. (2019). STEM eğitimi etkinliklerinin ilkokul dördüncü sınıf öğrencilerinin STEM’e yönelik tutumlarına, 21. yüzyıl becerilerine ve matematik başarılarına etkisi [The effect of STEM education activities on primary school fourth grade students’ attitudes towards STEM, 21st century skills and mathematics achievement]. Ph.D. diss., Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Samsun.
Boyacı, Ş. D., & Atalay, N. (2016). A scale development for 21st century skills of primary school students: A validity and reliability study. International Journal of Instruction, 9(1):1308-1470. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2016.9111a
Boyraz, A. (2019). İlköğretim yedinci sınıf öğrencilerinin maddenin yapısı ve özellikleri ünitesindeki başarılarına Legolarla zenginleştirilmiş işbirlikçi öğrenme yönteminin etkisi belirlenmesi [Determining the effect of collaborative learning method enriched with Legos on the achievements of primary school seventh grade students in the unit of the structure and properties of matter]. Master diss., Erciyes Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Kayseri.
Bybee, R. W. (2010). What is STEM education? Science, 327(5995):996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1194998
Cameron, R. G. (2005). Mindstorms Robolab: developing science concepts during a problem-based learning club. Master diss., Department of Curriculum, Teaching and Learning, The University of Toronto, Canada.
Cavas, B., Kesercioglu, T., Holbrook, J., Rannikmae, M., Ozdogru, E., & Gokler, F. (2012). The effects of robotics club on the students’ performance on science process & scientific creativity skills and perceptions on robots, human and society. In Proceedings of 3rd International Workshop Teaching Robotics, Teaching with Robotics Integrating Robotics in School Curriculum (pp. 40-50). ISBN 978-88-95872-05-6.
Coxon, S.V. (2011). The malleability of spatial ability under treatment of a first lego league-based robotics unit. Ph.D. diss., The Faculty of the School of Education The College of William and Mary, Virginia, USA.
Creswell, J.W. & Plano Clark, V.L. (2018). Karma yöntem araştırmaları tasarımı ve yürütülmesi [Mixed methods research design and conduct] Y. Dede & S.B. Demir (Çev.). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
Creswell, J.W. (2017). Araştırma deseni: nitel, nicel ve karma yöntem yaklaşımları [Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed method approaches] S.B. Demir, (Çev.) Ankara: Eğiten Kitap.
Cruz, I.L.J. (2019). Impact of educational robotics in promoting critical thinking skills of middle school students. Ph.D. diss., Southern Unıversıty and A&M College, Louisiana.
Cuperman, D. & Verner, I. M. (2019). Fostering analogical reasoning through creating robotic models of biological systems. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28(2):90-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-018-9750-4
Çakır, S. (2019). 4. sınıf fen bilimleri dersi “mikroskobik canlılar ve çevremiz” ünitesinde robotik kodlama uygulamalarının öğrenme ürünlerine etkisi [The effect of robotic coding applications on learning products in the unit of “microscopic living things and our environment” in the 4th grade science lesson]. Master diss., Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Zonguldak.
Çayır, E. (2010). LEGO-LOGO ile desteklenmiş öğrenme ortamının bilimsel süreç becerilerine ve benlik algısı üzerine etkisinin belirlenmesi [Determining the effect of learning environment supported with LEGO-LOGO on scientific process skills and self-perception]. Master diss., Sakarya Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Sakarya.
Dodson, D. (2011). LEGO® s go to college. South Shore Journal, 4. Available at: https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/ssj/article/view/13412
Ensign, T. I. (2017). Elementary educators’ attitudes about the utility of educational robotics and their ability and intent to use it with students Ph.D. diss., West Virginia University, USA.
Ercan, F. (2013). Fen alanında üstün yetenekli öğrencilerin tanılanmasına yönelik bir model geliştirme önerisi [Suggestion to develop a model for the identification of gifted students in science]. Ph.D. diss., Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Bolu.
Ghasemi A. & Zahediasl S. (2012). Normality tests for statistical analysis: A guide for non-statisticians. International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 10(2):486-489. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5812/ijem.3505
Gibbon, L.W. (2007). Effect of LEGO mindstorms on convergent and divergent problem-solving and spatial abilities in fifth and sixth grade students. Ph.D. diss., Seattle Pasific University, Washington, USA.
Gilbert, J. K. & Newberry, M. (2017). Fen alanında üstün yetenekli olan ve sıra dışı yeteneğe sahip bireylerin özellikleri [Characteristics of individuals who are gifted and extraordinary in science]. K.S. Taber (Ed.), Üstün yetenekliler için fen eğitimi [Science education for the gifted]. M. Göktepe (Çev.). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Gürevin, B. (2019). Öğrencilerin first lego lig (FLL) turnuvalarına yönelik tutumlarının çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi [Examination of students’ attitudes towards first lego league (FLL) tournaments in terms of various variables]. Master diss., Fırat Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Elazığ.
Hinton, T.B. (2017). An exploratory study of a robotics educational platform on STEM career interests in middle school students. Ph.D. diss., The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama.
Holmquist, S. K. (2014). A multi-case study of student interactions with educational robots and impact on Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) learning and attitudes Ph.D. diss., University of South Florida.
Jamali, U.A.Y. (2020). Fostering creativity using robotics among gifted primary school students. Gifted and Talented International, 34(1-2):71-78. DOI: https://10.1080/15332276.2020.1711545
Kazez, H., & Genç, Z. (2016). Research trends in LEGO and robotic usage in education: A document analysis. Journal of Instructional Technologies and Teacher Education, 5(1):19-31. Available at: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jitte/issue/25089/264784
Kılınç, A. (2014). Robotik teknolojisinin 7. Sınıf ışık ünitesi öğretiminde kullanımı [The use of robotic technology in 7th grade light unit teaching]. Master diss., Erciyes Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Kayseri.
Kimball, K. L. B. (2001). Interpretative stories from school careers of gifted students. Ph.D. diss., Miami University, USA.
Koç Şenol, A. (2012). Robotik destekli fen ve teknoloji laboratuvar uygulamaları: robolab [Robotic assisted science and technology laboratory applications: robolab]. Master diss., Erciyes Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Kayseri.
Kurtuluş, M.A. (2019). STEM etkinliklerinin öğrencilerin akademik başarılarına, problem çözme becerilerine, bilimsel yaratıcılıklarına, motivasyonlarına ve tutumlarına etkisi [The effect of STEM activities on students’ academic achievement, problem solving skills, scientific creativity, motivation and attitudes]. Master diss., Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Antalya.
Kuş, M. (2016). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin kuvvet ve hareket ünitesinin öğretiminde robotik modüllerin etkisi [The effect of robotic modules on the teaching of the force and motion unit of secondary school students]. Master diss., İstanbul Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
LEGO® Play Well Report, (2018). Last access: October 12, 2020, Available at: https://www.teknokta.com/files/genel/LEGO_Nitelikli_Oyun_Oyna_Play_Well_Raporu_2018.pdf?utm_medium=social&utm_source=linktree&utm_campaign=lego%C2%AE+nitelikli+oyun+oyna+%28play+well%29+raporu+2018
LEGO®, (2022a). Lego history. Last access: July 05, 2022, Available at: https://www.lego.com/en-us/history/
LEGO®, (2022b). Get ready with lessons, unit plans. Last access: October 12, 2020, Available at: https://education.lego.com/en-au/lessons?products=BricQ+Motion+Essential
Ma, Y., & Williams, D. C. (2013). The potential of a First LEGO League robotics program in teaching 21st century skills: An exploratory study. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange (JETDE), 6(2):13-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18785/jetde.0602.02
Marulcu, I., & Barnett, M. (2013). Fifth graders’ learning about simple machines through engineering design-based instruction using LEGO™ materials. Research in Science Education, 43(5):1825-1850. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9335-9
Ministry of National Education of Turkey (MoNET), (1991). Birinci özel eğitim konseyi ön raporu [First special education council preliminary report]. Ankara: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Özel Eğitim ve Rehberlik Dairesi Başkanlığı.
Ministry of National Education of Turkey (MoNET), (2013). Özel yetenekli bireyler strateji ve uygulama planı (2013-2017) [Gifted individuals strategy and implementation plan (2013-2017).]. Last access: Agust 10, 2020, Available at: https://orgm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2013_10/25043741_zelyeteneklibireylerstratejiveuygulamaplan20132017.pdf
Miles, B. M. & Huberman, A. M. (2019). Nitel veri analizi [Qualitative data analysis]. (A. Akbaba & Altun - A. Ersoy (Çev.). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Mojica, K.D. (2010). Ordered effects of technolology education units on higher-order critical thinking skills of middle school skills of middle school students. Ph.D. diss., Pace University, Newyork, USA.
NAGC, (2014). Common core and next generation science standards for gifted and talented students. Last access: September 25, 2020, Available at: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED600133.pdf
OECD, (2018). OECD Learning framework 2030. Last access: May 15, 2022, Available at: https://www.oecd.org/education/2030/E2030%20Position%20Paper%20(05.04.2018).pdf
Okkesim, B. (2014). Fen ve teknoloji eğitiminde robotik uygulamaları [Robotics applications in science and technology education]. Master diss., Erciyes Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Kayseri.
Özçelik, A., & Akgündüz, D. (2018). Evaluation of gifted/talented students’ out-of-school STEM education. Trakya University Journal of Education Faculty, 8(2):334-351.
Özdoğru, E. (2013). Fiziksel olaylar öğrenme alanı için lego program tabanlı fen ve teknoloji eğitiminin öğrencilerin akademik başarılarına, bilimsel süreç becerilerine ve fen ve teknoloji dersine yönelik tutumlarına etkisi [The effect of LEGO program-based science and technology education for physical phenomena learning area on students’ academic achievement, scientific process skills and attitudes towards science and technology lesson]. Master diss., Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İzmir.
P21- Partnership 21, (2020). Partnership for 21st century learning a network of battelle for kids. Last access: October 18, 2020, Available at: http://www.battelleforkids.org/networks/p21
Sawyer S. F. (2009). Analysis of variance: the fundamental concepts. The Journal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy, 17(2):27-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/jmt.2009.17.2.27E
Shores, T. (2017). Düşüncenin Yapı Taşları: LEGO ve oyun felsefesi [Building Blocks of Thought: LEGO and the philosophy of play]. R.T. Cook & S. Bacharack (Eds.), Lego asla sadece lego değildir [Lego is never just Lego]. İstanbul: The Kitap Yayınları.
Silva, J. M. V. D. (2008). Robótica no ensino da física. Last access: June 08, 2021, Available at: https://repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt/handle/1822/8069
Sim, J. & Wright, C. (2002). Research in health care: concepts, designs and methods. United Kingdom, Cheltenham: Nelson Thornes Ltd.
Şahin Çakır, Ç., Çakır, M., Damar, A. & Erdemir Yılmaz, D. (2021). Özel yetenekli öğrencilerin kodlama hakkındaki görüşlerinin belirlenmesi [Determining the opinions of gifted students about coding]. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Türk Dünyası Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi Eğitim Dergisi, 6(2):151-179.
Taber, K.S. (2017). Neden üstün yetenekliler için fen eğitimi? [Why science education for the gifted?] K.S. Taber (Ed.), Üstün yetenekliler için fen eğitimi [Science education for the gifted]. M. Göktepe (Çev.). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Taber, K. S. & Corrie, V. (2017). Fen yoluyla üstün yetenekli öğrencilerin düşünme becerililerini geliştirme [Developing the thinking skills of gifted students through science.]. K.S. Taber (Ed.), Üstün yetenekliler için fen eğitimi [Science education for the gifted]. M. Göktepe (Çev.). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Türnüklü, D. A. (2000). Eğitimbilim araştırmalarında etkin olarak kullanılabilecek nitel bir araştırma tekniği: görüşme [A qualitative research technique that can be used effectively in educational research: interview]. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 24(24):543-559.
Uğuz, H. (2019). Lego robotikle programlamanın problem çözme becerilerine ve başarılarına etkisi [The effect of programming with Lego robotics on problem solving skills and achievements]. Master diss., Atatürk Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Erzurum.
Williams, D. C., Ma, Y., Prejean, L., Ford, M. J., & Lai, G. (2007). Acquisition of physics content knowledge and scientific inquiry skills in a robotics summer camp. Journal of research on Technology in Education, 40(2):201-216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2007.10782505
Varnado, T.E. (2005). The effects of a technological problem solving activity on first lego league participants’ problem solving style and performance. Ph.D. diss., Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, USA.
Zengin, M. (2016). İlkokul, ortaokul ve lise öğrencilerin disiplinlerarası eğitim & öğretiminde robotik sistemlerinin kullanımına yönelik görüşleri [Primary, secondary and high school students’ views on the use of robotic systems in interdisciplinary education & teaching]. Journal of Gifted Education Research, 4(2):48-70.
Zimlich, S. L. (2012). Using technology in gifted and talented education classrooms: The teachers’ perspective. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 14(1):101-124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28945/2209
Atmatzidou, S., Demetriadis, S., & Nika, P. (2018). How does the degree of guidance support students’ metacognitive and problem solving skills in educational robotics? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27(1):70-85. DOI: https://10.1007/s10956-017-9709-x
Bender, W.N. (2018). STEM öğretimi için 20 strateji [20 strategies for STEM teaching]. S. Durmuş, A.S. İpek ve B. Yıldız (Çev.). Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
Benek, İ. (2019). Sosyobı̇lı̇msel STEM etkı̇nlı̇klerı̇nı̇n öğrencı̇lerı̇n tutumlarına ve 21. yüzyıl becerı̇lerı̇ne etkı̇sı̇nı̇n ı̇ncelenmesı̇ [Examination of the impact of sociological STEM activities on students’ attitudes and 21st century skills]. Ph.D. diss., İstanbul Ünı̇versı̇tesı̇, Cerrahpaşa Lı̇sansüstü Eğı̇tı̇m Enstı̇tüsü, İstanbul.
Bircan, M. A. (2019). STEM eğitimi etkinliklerinin ilkokul dördüncü sınıf öğrencilerinin STEM’e yönelik tutumlarına, 21. yüzyıl becerilerine ve matematik başarılarına etkisi [The effect of STEM education activities on primary school fourth grade students’ attitudes towards STEM, 21st century skills and mathematics achievement]. Ph.D. diss., Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Samsun.
Boyacı, Ş. D., & Atalay, N. (2016). A scale development for 21st century skills of primary school students: A validity and reliability study. International Journal of Instruction, 9(1):1308-1470. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2016.9111a
Boyraz, A. (2019). İlköğretim yedinci sınıf öğrencilerinin maddenin yapısı ve özellikleri ünitesindeki başarılarına Legolarla zenginleştirilmiş işbirlikçi öğrenme yönteminin etkisi belirlenmesi [Determining the effect of collaborative learning method enriched with Legos on the achievements of primary school seventh grade students in the unit of the structure and properties of matter]. Master diss., Erciyes Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Kayseri.
Bybee, R. W. (2010). What is STEM education? Science, 327(5995):996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1194998
Cameron, R. G. (2005). Mindstorms Robolab: developing science concepts during a problem-based learning club. Master diss., Department of Curriculum, Teaching and Learning, The University of Toronto, Canada.
Cavas, B., Kesercioglu, T., Holbrook, J., Rannikmae, M., Ozdogru, E., & Gokler, F. (2012). The effects of robotics club on the students’ performance on science process & scientific creativity skills and perceptions on robots, human and society. In Proceedings of 3rd International Workshop Teaching Robotics, Teaching with Robotics Integrating Robotics in School Curriculum (pp. 40-50). ISBN 978-88-95872-05-6.
Coxon, S.V. (2011). The malleability of spatial ability under treatment of a first lego league-based robotics unit. Ph.D. diss., The Faculty of the School of Education The College of William and Mary, Virginia, USA.
Creswell, J.W. & Plano Clark, V.L. (2018). Karma yöntem araştırmaları tasarımı ve yürütülmesi [Mixed methods research design and conduct] Y. Dede & S.B. Demir (Çev.). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
Creswell, J.W. (2017). Araştırma deseni: nitel, nicel ve karma yöntem yaklaşımları [Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed method approaches] S.B. Demir, (Çev.) Ankara: Eğiten Kitap.
Cruz, I.L.J. (2019). Impact of educational robotics in promoting critical thinking skills of middle school students. Ph.D. diss., Southern Unıversıty and A&M College, Louisiana.
Cuperman, D. & Verner, I. M. (2019). Fostering analogical reasoning through creating robotic models of biological systems. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28(2):90-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-018-9750-4
Çakır, S. (2019). 4. sınıf fen bilimleri dersi “mikroskobik canlılar ve çevremiz” ünitesinde robotik kodlama uygulamalarının öğrenme ürünlerine etkisi [The effect of robotic coding applications on learning products in the unit of “microscopic living things and our environment” in the 4th grade science lesson]. Master diss., Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Zonguldak.
Çayır, E. (2010). LEGO-LOGO ile desteklenmiş öğrenme ortamının bilimsel süreç becerilerine ve benlik algısı üzerine etkisinin belirlenmesi [Determining the effect of learning environment supported with LEGO-LOGO on scientific process skills and self-perception]. Master diss., Sakarya Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Sakarya.
Dodson, D. (2011). LEGO® s go to college. South Shore Journal, 4. Available at: https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/ssj/article/view/13412
Ensign, T. I. (2017). Elementary educators’ attitudes about the utility of educational robotics and their ability and intent to use it with students Ph.D. diss., West Virginia University, USA.
Ercan, F. (2013). Fen alanında üstün yetenekli öğrencilerin tanılanmasına yönelik bir model geliştirme önerisi [Suggestion to develop a model for the identification of gifted students in science]. Ph.D. diss., Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Bolu.
Ghasemi A. & Zahediasl S. (2012). Normality tests for statistical analysis: A guide for non-statisticians. International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 10(2):486-489. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5812/ijem.3505
Gibbon, L.W. (2007). Effect of LEGO mindstorms on convergent and divergent problem-solving and spatial abilities in fifth and sixth grade students. Ph.D. diss., Seattle Pasific University, Washington, USA.
Gilbert, J. K. & Newberry, M. (2017). Fen alanında üstün yetenekli olan ve sıra dışı yeteneğe sahip bireylerin özellikleri [Characteristics of individuals who are gifted and extraordinary in science]. K.S. Taber (Ed.), Üstün yetenekliler için fen eğitimi [Science education for the gifted]. M. Göktepe (Çev.). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Gürevin, B. (2019). Öğrencilerin first lego lig (FLL) turnuvalarına yönelik tutumlarının çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi [Examination of students’ attitudes towards first lego league (FLL) tournaments in terms of various variables]. Master diss., Fırat Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Elazığ.
Hinton, T.B. (2017). An exploratory study of a robotics educational platform on STEM career interests in middle school students. Ph.D. diss., The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama.
Holmquist, S. K. (2014). A multi-case study of student interactions with educational robots and impact on Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) learning and attitudes Ph.D. diss., University of South Florida.
Jamali, U.A.Y. (2020). Fostering creativity using robotics among gifted primary school students. Gifted and Talented International, 34(1-2):71-78. DOI: https://10.1080/15332276.2020.1711545
Kazez, H., & Genç, Z. (2016). Research trends in LEGO and robotic usage in education: A document analysis. Journal of Instructional Technologies and Teacher Education, 5(1):19-31. Available at: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jitte/issue/25089/264784
Kılınç, A. (2014). Robotik teknolojisinin 7. Sınıf ışık ünitesi öğretiminde kullanımı [The use of robotic technology in 7th grade light unit teaching]. Master diss., Erciyes Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Kayseri.
Kimball, K. L. B. (2001). Interpretative stories from school careers of gifted students. Ph.D. diss., Miami University, USA.
Koç Şenol, A. (2012). Robotik destekli fen ve teknoloji laboratuvar uygulamaları: robolab [Robotic assisted science and technology laboratory applications: robolab]. Master diss., Erciyes Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Kayseri.
Kurtuluş, M.A. (2019). STEM etkinliklerinin öğrencilerin akademik başarılarına, problem çözme becerilerine, bilimsel yaratıcılıklarına, motivasyonlarına ve tutumlarına etkisi [The effect of STEM activities on students’ academic achievement, problem solving skills, scientific creativity, motivation and attitudes]. Master diss., Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Antalya.
Kuş, M. (2016). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin kuvvet ve hareket ünitesinin öğretiminde robotik modüllerin etkisi [The effect of robotic modules on the teaching of the force and motion unit of secondary school students]. Master diss., İstanbul Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
LEGO® Play Well Report, (2018). Last access: October 12, 2020, Available at: https://www.teknokta.com/files/genel/LEGO_Nitelikli_Oyun_Oyna_Play_Well_Raporu_2018.pdf?utm_medium=social&utm_source=linktree&utm_campaign=lego%C2%AE+nitelikli+oyun+oyna+%28play+well%29+raporu+2018
LEGO®, (2022a). Lego history. Last access: July 05, 2022, Available at: https://www.lego.com/en-us/history/
LEGO®, (2022b). Get ready with lessons, unit plans. Last access: October 12, 2020, Available at: https://education.lego.com/en-au/lessons?products=BricQ+Motion+Essential
Ma, Y., & Williams, D. C. (2013). The potential of a First LEGO League robotics program in teaching 21st century skills: An exploratory study. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange (JETDE), 6(2):13-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18785/jetde.0602.02
Marulcu, I., & Barnett, M. (2013). Fifth graders’ learning about simple machines through engineering design-based instruction using LEGO™ materials. Research in Science Education, 43(5):1825-1850. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9335-9
Ministry of National Education of Turkey (MoNET), (1991). Birinci özel eğitim konseyi ön raporu [First special education council preliminary report]. Ankara: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Özel Eğitim ve Rehberlik Dairesi Başkanlığı.
Ministry of National Education of Turkey (MoNET), (2013). Özel yetenekli bireyler strateji ve uygulama planı (2013-2017) [Gifted individuals strategy and implementation plan (2013-2017).]. Last access: Agust 10, 2020, Available at: https://orgm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2013_10/25043741_zelyeteneklibireylerstratejiveuygulamaplan20132017.pdf
Miles, B. M. & Huberman, A. M. (2019). Nitel veri analizi [Qualitative data analysis]. (A. Akbaba & Altun - A. Ersoy (Çev.). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Mojica, K.D. (2010). Ordered effects of technolology education units on higher-order critical thinking skills of middle school skills of middle school students. Ph.D. diss., Pace University, Newyork, USA.
NAGC, (2014). Common core and next generation science standards for gifted and talented students. Last access: September 25, 2020, Available at: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED600133.pdf
OECD, (2018). OECD Learning framework 2030. Last access: May 15, 2022, Available at: https://www.oecd.org/education/2030/E2030%20Position%20Paper%20(05.04.2018).pdf
Okkesim, B. (2014). Fen ve teknoloji eğitiminde robotik uygulamaları [Robotics applications in science and technology education]. Master diss., Erciyes Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Kayseri.
Özçelik, A., & Akgündüz, D. (2018). Evaluation of gifted/talented students’ out-of-school STEM education. Trakya University Journal of Education Faculty, 8(2):334-351.
Özdoğru, E. (2013). Fiziksel olaylar öğrenme alanı için lego program tabanlı fen ve teknoloji eğitiminin öğrencilerin akademik başarılarına, bilimsel süreç becerilerine ve fen ve teknoloji dersine yönelik tutumlarına etkisi [The effect of LEGO program-based science and technology education for physical phenomena learning area on students’ academic achievement, scientific process skills and attitudes towards science and technology lesson]. Master diss., Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İzmir.
P21- Partnership 21, (2020). Partnership for 21st century learning a network of battelle for kids. Last access: October 18, 2020, Available at: http://www.battelleforkids.org/networks/p21
Sawyer S. F. (2009). Analysis of variance: the fundamental concepts. The Journal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy, 17(2):27-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/jmt.2009.17.2.27E
Shores, T. (2017). Düşüncenin Yapı Taşları: LEGO ve oyun felsefesi [Building Blocks of Thought: LEGO and the philosophy of play]. R.T. Cook & S. Bacharack (Eds.), Lego asla sadece lego değildir [Lego is never just Lego]. İstanbul: The Kitap Yayınları.
Silva, J. M. V. D. (2008). Robótica no ensino da física. Last access: June 08, 2021, Available at: https://repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt/handle/1822/8069
Sim, J. & Wright, C. (2002). Research in health care: concepts, designs and methods. United Kingdom, Cheltenham: Nelson Thornes Ltd.
Şahin Çakır, Ç., Çakır, M., Damar, A. & Erdemir Yılmaz, D. (2021). Özel yetenekli öğrencilerin kodlama hakkındaki görüşlerinin belirlenmesi [Determining the opinions of gifted students about coding]. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Türk Dünyası Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi Eğitim Dergisi, 6(2):151-179.
Taber, K.S. (2017). Neden üstün yetenekliler için fen eğitimi? [Why science education for the gifted?] K.S. Taber (Ed.), Üstün yetenekliler için fen eğitimi [Science education for the gifted]. M. Göktepe (Çev.). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Taber, K. S. & Corrie, V. (2017). Fen yoluyla üstün yetenekli öğrencilerin düşünme becerililerini geliştirme [Developing the thinking skills of gifted students through science.]. K.S. Taber (Ed.), Üstün yetenekliler için fen eğitimi [Science education for the gifted]. M. Göktepe (Çev.). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Türnüklü, D. A. (2000). Eğitimbilim araştırmalarında etkin olarak kullanılabilecek nitel bir araştırma tekniği: görüşme [A qualitative research technique that can be used effectively in educational research: interview]. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 24(24):543-559.
Uğuz, H. (2019). Lego robotikle programlamanın problem çözme becerilerine ve başarılarına etkisi [The effect of programming with Lego robotics on problem solving skills and achievements]. Master diss., Atatürk Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Erzurum.
Williams, D. C., Ma, Y., Prejean, L., Ford, M. J., & Lai, G. (2007). Acquisition of physics content knowledge and scientific inquiry skills in a robotics summer camp. Journal of research on Technology in Education, 40(2):201-216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2007.10782505
Varnado, T.E. (2005). The effects of a technological problem solving activity on first lego league participants’ problem solving style and performance. Ph.D. diss., Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, USA.
Zengin, M. (2016). İlkokul, ortaokul ve lise öğrencilerin disiplinlerarası eğitim & öğretiminde robotik sistemlerinin kullanımına yönelik görüşleri [Primary, secondary and high school students’ views on the use of robotic systems in interdisciplinary education & teaching]. Journal of Gifted Education Research, 4(2):48-70.
Zimlich, S. L. (2012). Using technology in gifted and talented education classrooms: The teachers’ perspective. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 14(1):101-124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28945/2209
How to Cite
Babaoğlu, G., & Güven Yıldırım, E. (2023). The Effect on Gifted Students’ 21st-Century Skills of Supporting Science Teaching with LEGO® Education® BricQ Motion Essential and Student Opinions on this Instruction . Science Insights Education Frontiers, 15(2), 2305–2324. https://doi.org/10.15354/sief.23.or216
Issue
Section
Original Article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.