Trends and Issues in Science Education in the New Millennium: A Bibliometric Analysis of the JRST
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Published
May 31, 2023
Abstract
As a real time socio-scientific issue, the COVID-19 pandemic has clearly shown us the need for the public to understand science. As experts have repeatedly stressed in recent years, science education plays an important role in developing scientifically literate societies. In this context, it is critical to consider which subjects science educators frequently concentrate on and the messages they give to researchers, policymakers, and other stakeholders. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to use bibliometric data to understand the topics that the articles in the Journal of Research in Science Teaching (JRST), one of the flagship journals about science education and teaching, focused on over the last 20 years. This study employed both descriptive and bibliometric analysis. Based on data from the Web of Science (WoS), descriptive analyses are presented as frequencies and percentages and we used VOSviewer software for bibliometric analysis. Findings showed that more than 80% of the authors of the JRST are from the United States, Australia, Canada, and the United Kingdom. Moreover, results of these analyses demonstrate that the researchers publishing in the JRST focused on two main ideas over the past 20 years: “Which science teaching methods and strategies are most effective?” and “What can be done to make science teaching more inclusive?” As a result, it can be clearly seen that JRST has special attention on inclusive approach in science education which should be designed to include traditionally underrepresented groups.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Keywords
Bibliometric Analysis, JRST, Inclusive Education, Science Education
References
Abd-El-Khalick, F., Zeidler, D. L., & Niswander, E. C. (2021). Editors’ report: Reflections for the Journal of Research in Science Teaching (2015–2020). Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(2):159-169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21678
Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Cicero, T. (2012). What is the appropriate length of the publication period over which to assess research performance? Scientometrics, 93(3):1005-1017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0714-9
Al, U., Soydal, İ., & Yalçın, H. (2010). Bibliyometrik özellikleri açısından bilig’in değerlendirilmesi. Bilig, 55, 1-20.
Anninos, L. N. (2014). Research performance evaluation: some critical thoughts on standard bibliometric indicators. Studies in Higher Education, 39(9):1542-1561. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.801429
Assefa, S. G., & Rorissa, A. (2013). A bibliometric mapping of the structure of STEM education using co-word analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(12):2513-2536. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22917
Atwater, M. M. (2000). Equity for Black Americans in precollege science. Science Education, 84(2):154-179. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200003)84:2<154::AID-SCE2>3.0.CO;2-R
Atwater, M. M. (2011). Significant science education research on multicultural science education, equity, a social justice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(1):O1-O5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20453
Avraamidou, L. (2022). Identities in/out of physics and the politics of recognition. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 59(1):58-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21721
Ballard, H. L., Barton, A. C., & Upadhyay, B. (2021). Call for papers Journal of Research in Science Teaching Special Issue Community-driven science: Evidence of and implications for equity, justice, science learning, and participation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(5):621-624. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21690
Budd, J. M., & Magnuson, L. (2010). Higher education literature revisited: Citation patterns examined. Research in Higher Education, 51(3):294-304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-009-9155-6
Bybee, R. W. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. Heinemann, 88 Post Road West, PO Box 5007, Westport, CT 06881.
Callon, M., Rip, A., & Law, J. (Eds.). (1986). Mapping the dynamics of science and technology: Sociology of science in the real world. Springer.
Carlone, H. B. (2004). The cultural production of science in reform-based physics: Girls’ access, participation, and resistance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(4):392-414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20006
Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8):1187-1218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20237
Chiu, M. H., & Duit, R. (2011). Globalization: Science education from an international perspective. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6):553-566. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20427
Comarú, M. W., Lopes, R. M., Braga, L. A. M., Batista Mota, F., & Galvão, C. (2021). A bibliometric and descriptiveanalysis of inclusive education in science education. Studies in Science Education, 57(2):241-263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2021.1897930
Concannon, J. P., Brown, P. L., Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2020). Investigating the development of secondary students’ views about scientific inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 42(6):906-933. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1742399
Diem, A., & Wolter, S. C. (2013). The use of bibliometrics to measure research performance in education sciences. Research in Higher Education, 54(1):86-114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-012-9264-5
Díez-Martín, F., Blanco-González, A., & Prado-Román, C. (2021). The intellectual structure of organizational legitimacy research: a co-citation analysis in business journals. Review of Managerial Science, 15(4):1007-1043. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-020-00380-6
Dogan, O. K. (2021). Methodological? Or dialectical? Reflections of scientific inquiry in biology textbooks. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(8):1563-1585. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10120-7
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: Anoverview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133:285-296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
Earp, V. J. (2010). A bibliometric snapshot of the journal of higher education and its impact on the field. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 29(4):283-295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639269.2010.521034
Gholampour, S., Noruzi, A., Gholampour, B., & Elahi, A. (2019). Research trends and bibliometric analysis of a journal: Sport management review. Webology, 16(2):223-241. DOI: http://www.webology.org/2019/v16n2/a200.pdf
Güneş, E., Üstündağ, M. T., Yalçın, H., & Safran, M. (2017). Investigating educational research articles (1980-2014) in terms of bibliometric indicators. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 9(1):101-117. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15345/iojes.2017.01.008
Gümüş, S., Bellibaş, M. Ş., Gümüş, E., & Hallinger, P. (2020). Science mapping research on educational leadership and management in Turkey: A bibliometric review of international publications. School Leadership & Management, 40(1):23-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1578737
Hallinger, P., & Kovačević, J. (2019). A bibliometric review of research on educational administration: Science mapping the literature, 1960 to 2018. Review of Educational Research, 89(3):335-369. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319830380
Hallinger, P. (2020). Science mapping the knowledge base on educational leadership and management from the emerging regions of Asia, Africa and Latin America, 1965–2018. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(2):209-230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143218822772
Hughes, R., Schellinger, J., & Roberts, K. (2021). The role of recognition in disciplinary identity for girls. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(3):420-455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21665
Irez, S., & Han, C. (2011). Educational Reforms as Paradigm Shifts: Utilizing Kuhnian Lenses for a Better Understanding of the Meaning of, and Resistance to, Educational Change. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 6(3):251-266. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ959419.pdf
Laengle, S., Merigó, J. M., Miranda, J., Słowiński, R., Bomze, I., Borgonovo, E., ... & Teunter, R. (2017). Forty years of the European Journal of Operational Research: A bibliometric overview. European Journal of Operational Research, 262(3):803-816. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.04.027
Laengle, S., Modak, N. M., Merigó, J. M., & De La Sotta, C. (2018). Thirty years of the International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing: a bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 31(12):1247-1268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2018.1529434
Leary, H., & Walker, A. (2018). Meta-analysis and meta-synthesis methodologies: Rigorously piecing together research. TechTrends, 62(5):525-534. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0312-7
Levitt, K. E. (2002). An analysis of elementary teachers’ beliefs regarding the teaching and learning of science. Science Education, 86(1):1-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1042
Matthews, M. R. (2002). Constructivism and science education: A further appraisal. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 11(2):121-134. DOI: https://doi.org/1059-0145/02/0600-0121/0
Matthews, M. R. (2004). Thomas Kuhn’s impact on science education: What lessons can be learned? Science Education, 88(1):90-118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10111
Merigó, J. M., & Yang, J. B. (2017). A bibliometric analysis of operations research and management science. Omega, 73:37-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2016.12.004
Moed, H. F. (2005). Statistical relationships between downloads and citations at the level of individual documents within a single journal. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(10):1088-1097. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20200
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., Altman, D., Antes, G., & Tugwell, P. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (Chinese edition). Journal of Chinese Integrative Medicine, 7(9):889-896. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135
Mutegi, J. W. (2013). “Life’s first need is for us to be realistic” and other reasons for examining the sociocultural construction of race in the science performance of African American students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(1):82-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21065
Mutegi, J. W., Sorge, B., Fore, G. A., & Gibau, G. S. (2019). A tale of two camps: A mixed methods investigation into racially disparate outcomes in a nanotechnology research experience. Science Education, 103(6):1456-1477. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21548
Narin, F. (1976). Evaluative bibliometrics: The use of publication and citation analysis in the evaluation of scientific activity (pp. 206-219). Cherry Hill, NJ: Computer Horizons.
Nguyen, T. H., Gasman, M., Washington Lockett, A., & Peña, V. (2021). Nguyen, T. H., Gasman, M., Washington Lockett, A., & Peña, V. (2021). Supporting Black women’s pursuits in STEM. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(6):879-905. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21682
O’Connor, P., & Irvine, G. (2020). Multi-level state interventions and gender equality in higher education institutions: The Irish case. Administrative Sciences, 10(4):98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci10040098
Pasadeos, Y., Phelps, J., & Kim, B. H. (1998). Disciplinary impact of advertising scholars: Temporal comparisons of influential authors, works and research networks. Journal of Advertising, 27(4):53-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1998.10673569
Pedretti, E., & Hodson, D. (1995). From rhetoric to action: Implementing STS education through action research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(5):463-485. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660320505
Phelan, T. J. (2000). Bibliometrics and the evaluation of Australian sociology. Journal of Sociology, 36(3):345-363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/144078330003600305
Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation, 25(4):348-349.
Ramos-Rodríguez, A. R., & Ruíz-Navarro, J. (2004). Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: A bibliometric study of the Strategic Management Journal, 1980–2000. Strategic Management Journal, 25(10):981-1004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.397
Reiss, M. J. (2020). Science Education in the Light of COVID-19. Science & Education, 29(4):1079-1092. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00143-5
Roberts, D. A., & Bybee, R. W. (2014). Scientific literacy, science literacy, and science education. Handbook of Research on Science Education, 2:545-558.
Roth, W. M., & Barton, A. C. (2004). Rethinking scientific literacy. Psychology Press.
Russell, M. L., & Atwater, M. M. (2005). Traveling the road to success: A discourse on persistence throughout the science pipeline with African American students at a predominantly white institution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(6):691-715. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20068
Taylor, P. C., Fraser, B. J., & Fisher, D. L. (1997). Monitoring constructivist classroom learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research, 27:293-302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(97)90011-2
Westbrook, J. H. (1960). Identifying Significant Research: Literature citation counting is evaluated as a means for identification of significant research. Science, 132(3435):1229-1234.
Xu, X., Chen, X., Jia, F., Brown, S., Gong, Y., & Xu, Y. (2018). Supply chain finance: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 204:160-173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.08.003
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2):523-538. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Vogel, R., & Güttel, W. H. (2013). The dynamic capability view in strategic management: A bibliometric review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(4):426-446. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12000
Yager, R. E. (2000). A vision for what science education should be like for the first 25 years of a new millennium. School Science and Mathematics, 100(6):327-341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2000.tb17327.x
Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3):429-447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629.
Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Cicero, T. (2012). What is the appropriate length of the publication period over which to assess research performance? Scientometrics, 93(3):1005-1017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0714-9
Al, U., Soydal, İ., & Yalçın, H. (2010). Bibliyometrik özellikleri açısından bilig’in değerlendirilmesi. Bilig, 55, 1-20.
Anninos, L. N. (2014). Research performance evaluation: some critical thoughts on standard bibliometric indicators. Studies in Higher Education, 39(9):1542-1561. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.801429
Assefa, S. G., & Rorissa, A. (2013). A bibliometric mapping of the structure of STEM education using co-word analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(12):2513-2536. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22917
Atwater, M. M. (2000). Equity for Black Americans in precollege science. Science Education, 84(2):154-179. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200003)84:2<154::AID-SCE2>3.0.CO;2-R
Atwater, M. M. (2011). Significant science education research on multicultural science education, equity, a social justice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(1):O1-O5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20453
Avraamidou, L. (2022). Identities in/out of physics and the politics of recognition. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 59(1):58-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21721
Ballard, H. L., Barton, A. C., & Upadhyay, B. (2021). Call for papers Journal of Research in Science Teaching Special Issue Community-driven science: Evidence of and implications for equity, justice, science learning, and participation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(5):621-624. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21690
Budd, J. M., & Magnuson, L. (2010). Higher education literature revisited: Citation patterns examined. Research in Higher Education, 51(3):294-304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-009-9155-6
Bybee, R. W. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. Heinemann, 88 Post Road West, PO Box 5007, Westport, CT 06881.
Callon, M., Rip, A., & Law, J. (Eds.). (1986). Mapping the dynamics of science and technology: Sociology of science in the real world. Springer.
Carlone, H. B. (2004). The cultural production of science in reform-based physics: Girls’ access, participation, and resistance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(4):392-414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20006
Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8):1187-1218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20237
Chiu, M. H., & Duit, R. (2011). Globalization: Science education from an international perspective. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6):553-566. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20427
Comarú, M. W., Lopes, R. M., Braga, L. A. M., Batista Mota, F., & Galvão, C. (2021). A bibliometric and descriptiveanalysis of inclusive education in science education. Studies in Science Education, 57(2):241-263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2021.1897930
Concannon, J. P., Brown, P. L., Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2020). Investigating the development of secondary students’ views about scientific inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 42(6):906-933. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1742399
Diem, A., & Wolter, S. C. (2013). The use of bibliometrics to measure research performance in education sciences. Research in Higher Education, 54(1):86-114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-012-9264-5
Díez-Martín, F., Blanco-González, A., & Prado-Román, C. (2021). The intellectual structure of organizational legitimacy research: a co-citation analysis in business journals. Review of Managerial Science, 15(4):1007-1043. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-020-00380-6
Dogan, O. K. (2021). Methodological? Or dialectical? Reflections of scientific inquiry in biology textbooks. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(8):1563-1585. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10120-7
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: Anoverview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133:285-296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
Earp, V. J. (2010). A bibliometric snapshot of the journal of higher education and its impact on the field. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 29(4):283-295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639269.2010.521034
Gholampour, S., Noruzi, A., Gholampour, B., & Elahi, A. (2019). Research trends and bibliometric analysis of a journal: Sport management review. Webology, 16(2):223-241. DOI: http://www.webology.org/2019/v16n2/a200.pdf
Güneş, E., Üstündağ, M. T., Yalçın, H., & Safran, M. (2017). Investigating educational research articles (1980-2014) in terms of bibliometric indicators. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 9(1):101-117. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15345/iojes.2017.01.008
Gümüş, S., Bellibaş, M. Ş., Gümüş, E., & Hallinger, P. (2020). Science mapping research on educational leadership and management in Turkey: A bibliometric review of international publications. School Leadership & Management, 40(1):23-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1578737
Hallinger, P., & Kovačević, J. (2019). A bibliometric review of research on educational administration: Science mapping the literature, 1960 to 2018. Review of Educational Research, 89(3):335-369. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319830380
Hallinger, P. (2020). Science mapping the knowledge base on educational leadership and management from the emerging regions of Asia, Africa and Latin America, 1965–2018. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(2):209-230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143218822772
Hughes, R., Schellinger, J., & Roberts, K. (2021). The role of recognition in disciplinary identity for girls. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(3):420-455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21665
Irez, S., & Han, C. (2011). Educational Reforms as Paradigm Shifts: Utilizing Kuhnian Lenses for a Better Understanding of the Meaning of, and Resistance to, Educational Change. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 6(3):251-266. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ959419.pdf
Laengle, S., Merigó, J. M., Miranda, J., Słowiński, R., Bomze, I., Borgonovo, E., ... & Teunter, R. (2017). Forty years of the European Journal of Operational Research: A bibliometric overview. European Journal of Operational Research, 262(3):803-816. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.04.027
Laengle, S., Modak, N. M., Merigó, J. M., & De La Sotta, C. (2018). Thirty years of the International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing: a bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 31(12):1247-1268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2018.1529434
Leary, H., & Walker, A. (2018). Meta-analysis and meta-synthesis methodologies: Rigorously piecing together research. TechTrends, 62(5):525-534. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0312-7
Levitt, K. E. (2002). An analysis of elementary teachers’ beliefs regarding the teaching and learning of science. Science Education, 86(1):1-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1042
Matthews, M. R. (2002). Constructivism and science education: A further appraisal. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 11(2):121-134. DOI: https://doi.org/1059-0145/02/0600-0121/0
Matthews, M. R. (2004). Thomas Kuhn’s impact on science education: What lessons can be learned? Science Education, 88(1):90-118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10111
Merigó, J. M., & Yang, J. B. (2017). A bibliometric analysis of operations research and management science. Omega, 73:37-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2016.12.004
Moed, H. F. (2005). Statistical relationships between downloads and citations at the level of individual documents within a single journal. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(10):1088-1097. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20200
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., Altman, D., Antes, G., & Tugwell, P. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (Chinese edition). Journal of Chinese Integrative Medicine, 7(9):889-896. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135
Mutegi, J. W. (2013). “Life’s first need is for us to be realistic” and other reasons for examining the sociocultural construction of race in the science performance of African American students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(1):82-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21065
Mutegi, J. W., Sorge, B., Fore, G. A., & Gibau, G. S. (2019). A tale of two camps: A mixed methods investigation into racially disparate outcomes in a nanotechnology research experience. Science Education, 103(6):1456-1477. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21548
Narin, F. (1976). Evaluative bibliometrics: The use of publication and citation analysis in the evaluation of scientific activity (pp. 206-219). Cherry Hill, NJ: Computer Horizons.
Nguyen, T. H., Gasman, M., Washington Lockett, A., & Peña, V. (2021). Nguyen, T. H., Gasman, M., Washington Lockett, A., & Peña, V. (2021). Supporting Black women’s pursuits in STEM. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(6):879-905. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21682
O’Connor, P., & Irvine, G. (2020). Multi-level state interventions and gender equality in higher education institutions: The Irish case. Administrative Sciences, 10(4):98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci10040098
Pasadeos, Y., Phelps, J., & Kim, B. H. (1998). Disciplinary impact of advertising scholars: Temporal comparisons of influential authors, works and research networks. Journal of Advertising, 27(4):53-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1998.10673569
Pedretti, E., & Hodson, D. (1995). From rhetoric to action: Implementing STS education through action research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(5):463-485. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660320505
Phelan, T. J. (2000). Bibliometrics and the evaluation of Australian sociology. Journal of Sociology, 36(3):345-363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/144078330003600305
Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation, 25(4):348-349.
Ramos-Rodríguez, A. R., & Ruíz-Navarro, J. (2004). Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: A bibliometric study of the Strategic Management Journal, 1980–2000. Strategic Management Journal, 25(10):981-1004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.397
Reiss, M. J. (2020). Science Education in the Light of COVID-19. Science & Education, 29(4):1079-1092. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00143-5
Roberts, D. A., & Bybee, R. W. (2014). Scientific literacy, science literacy, and science education. Handbook of Research on Science Education, 2:545-558.
Roth, W. M., & Barton, A. C. (2004). Rethinking scientific literacy. Psychology Press.
Russell, M. L., & Atwater, M. M. (2005). Traveling the road to success: A discourse on persistence throughout the science pipeline with African American students at a predominantly white institution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(6):691-715. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20068
Taylor, P. C., Fraser, B. J., & Fisher, D. L. (1997). Monitoring constructivist classroom learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research, 27:293-302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(97)90011-2
Westbrook, J. H. (1960). Identifying Significant Research: Literature citation counting is evaluated as a means for identification of significant research. Science, 132(3435):1229-1234.
Xu, X., Chen, X., Jia, F., Brown, S., Gong, Y., & Xu, Y. (2018). Supply chain finance: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 204:160-173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.08.003
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2):523-538. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Vogel, R., & Güttel, W. H. (2013). The dynamic capability view in strategic management: A bibliometric review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(4):426-446. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12000
Yager, R. E. (2000). A vision for what science education should be like for the first 25 years of a new millennium. School Science and Mathematics, 100(6):327-341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2000.tb17327.x
Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3):429-447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629.
How to Cite
Dogan, O. K. (2023). Trends and Issues in Science Education in the New Millennium: A Bibliometric Analysis of the JRST. Science Insights Education Frontiers, 16(1), 2375–2407. https://doi.org/10.15354/sief.23.or249
Issue
Section
Original Article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.