##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Sep 30, 2025

Zübeyde Burçin Usta  

Hatice Mertoğlu

Esra Akgül

Abstract

The research study focuses on prospective teachers’ scientific literacy and STEM efficacy beliefs. 105 prospective teachers from 2 universities participated in this research. For examining scientific literacy of participants, two components of science literacy (scientist and nature of science) were defined. A questionnaire, “science literacy scale “developed by the researchers and applied to participants first.  Later, for the second component of scientific literacy, scientist and where and how he/she works, participants were asked to draw pictures. Finally, for STEM efficacy beliefs, “Prospective Teachers’ Self-Efficacy Scale towards Science-Technology-Engineering-Mathematics” was ap-plied. Data collected through scales were statistically analyzed and participants’ drawings about scientists and their work environment were scanned to be filed in computer. Drawings were open coded first and with the grouping of codes, themes were identified. Statistical analysis of science literacy scale and themes emerged from qualitative analysis were evaluated together to understand scientific literacy levels of the participants. In conclusion, prospective teachers have an average level of scientific literacy and neither gender nor department attended has significant change. Also, prospective teachers have slightly more than average STEM efficacy beliefs and neither gender nor department attended has significant change.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Prospective Teachers, Scientific Literacy, STEM Efficacy Beliefs

Supporting Agencies

No funding sources declared.

References
Balcın, M., & Ergun, A. (2018). Secondary school students’ perceptions and attitudes about scientists. European Journal of Education Studies, 0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.1518

Connor, A. M., Karmokar, S., & Whittington, C. (2015). From stem to steam: strategies forenhancing engineering & technology education. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (IJEP), 5(2), 37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v5i2.4458

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluatingquantitative and qualitative research. USA: Pearson Education Inc.

DeCoito, I., & Myszkal, P. (2018). Connecting science instruction and teachers’ self-efficacy and beliefs in STEM education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29, 485–503. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2018.1473748

Demirbag, C., Arıkan, S., & Mugaloglu, E. Z. (2020). Adaptation of the self-efficacy beliefs in STEM education scale and testing measurement invariance across groups. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 11(2), 163-179.

Escobar, M., Majewski, H. M., Qazi, M., & Rawajfih, Y. (2023). Self-efficacy in STEM. International Encyclopedia of Education, 4(11), 388-394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12818630-5.13049-0

Er, K. O., & Acar, D. (2020). Öğretmen adaylarının stem farkındalıkları ile stemuygulamalarına ilişkin özyeterlik inançları arasındaki ilişki. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, 14(2), 941-987. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17522/balikesirnef.837613

Gelen, B., Akcay, B., Tiryaki, A., & Benek, I. (2019). Fen bilimleri öğretmen adaylarının fen teknoloji-mühendislik-matematik (fetemm)’e yönelik özyeterlik ölçeği: Türkçe’ye uyarlama, geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama, 15(1), 88-107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17244/eku.395204

Hadiprayitno, G., Lestari, N., Kusmiyati, K., Sukri, A., & Irawan, J. (2022). An analysis on students problem-solving skill and scientific literacy based on higher order thinking skills (hots) viewed from gender. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(5), 2508–2512. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i5.2287

Ivgin, A. B., Akcay, H., & Kapici, H. O. (2021). Middle school students‟ perceptions of scientists and views about to become a scientist. International Journal on Social and Education Sciences (IJonSES), 3(3), 410-428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonses.176

Kumar, K., & Banerjee, P. (2018). Functional scientific literacy among prospective teachers:A comparative study. International Journal of Advanced Educational Research, 3(2), 160-164.

Latifah, S., Susilowati, N. E., Khoiriyah, K., Rahayu, R. (2019). Self-efficacy: Its correlation to the scientific literacy of prospective physics teacher. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1155012015.

Lestari, H., Rahmawati, I., Siskandar, R., & Dafenta, H. (2021). Implementation of blended learning with a stem approach to improve student scientific literacy skills during the covid-19 pandemic. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(2), 224-231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7i2.654

MAXQDA. (2025, Jan 10). Content analysis with MAXQDA. https://www.maxqda.com/content-analysis

Nurhayati, Y., Sopandi, W., & Riandi, R. (2023). Scientific literacy profile of pre-serviceelementary school teacher students. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9, 5474-5480. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i7.3510

Osborne, J., & Allchin, D. (2024). Science literacy in the twenty-first century: informed trust and the competent outsider. International Journal of Science Education, 1–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2024.2331980. http://www.engr.psu.edu/AWE/ARPresources.aspx

Rittmayer, A. D., & Beier, M. E. (2008). Overview: Self-efficacy in STEM. SWE-AWECASEE Overviews, 1(3), 1-12.

Sjöström, J., & Eilks, I. (2018). Reconsidering Different Visions of Scientific Literacy and Science Education Based on the Concept of Bildung. In: Dori, Y.J., Mevarech, Z.R., Baker, D.R. (eds) Cognition, Metacognition, and Culture in STEM Education. Innovations in Science Education and Technology, 24. Springer, Cham. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66659-4_4

Tuncer, G., Tekkaya, C., Sungur, S., Cakiroglu, J., Ertepinar, H., & Kaplowitz, M. (2009). Assessing pre-service teachers’ environmental literacy in Turkey as a mean to develop teacher education programs. Int. J. Educ. Dev., 29 (4), 426-436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2008.10.003

Valladares, L. (2021). Scientific literacy and social transformation: critical perspectives about science participation and emancipation. Science & Education, 30 (10). DOI: https://doi.org/1007/s11191-021-00205-2

Yasar Ekici, F., Bardak, M., & Yousef Zadeh, M. (2018). Erken Cocukluk Doneminde STEM. K. A. Kırkıc & E. Aydin (Eds.) icinde, Merhaba STEM Yenilikçi Bir Ögretim Yaklasimi (s.51-78). Konya: Egitim Yayinevi.
How to Cite
Usta, Z. B., Mertoğlu, H., & Akgül, E. (2025). Examining Prospective Teachers’ Scientific Literacy and STEM Efficacy Beliefs. Science Insights Education Frontiers, 30(1), 4825–4840. https://doi.org/10.15354/sief.25.or824
Section
Original Article