Erratum: Using the Mixed-Meta Method to Assess Portfolios in Science Teaching

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Oct 28, 2024

Mehmet Diyaddin Yaşar  
Education Faculty, Harran University, Şanlıurfa, Turkey

Veli Batdi
Education Faculty, Gazianep University, Gaziantep, Turkey

Büşra Kilinç
MSc Student and Science Teacher, Education Faculty, Harran University, Şanlıurfa, Turkey

Ayşe Nur Kiliç
MSc Student and Science Teacher, Education Faculty, Harran University, Şanlıurfa, Turkey

Abstract

The corrections should be made as below,



  • The (Alkan et al., 2019) used in the Methods section needs to be deleted. The Alkan et al. study is a mixed method [(Mixed methods design: a narrative literature review. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 7(2):559-582)]. However, the term used in our study is mixed-meta method. In addition, the term belongs to a different author and it has a completely different definition. (On the pages 3900 and 3914).

  • Instead of “(Büyüköztürk et al., 2018 p.259-260)” (Batdı, 2020, p.3) should be added under the title “Meta-analysis procedure”. (On the page 3903).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords
References
How to Cite
Yaşar, M. D., Batdi, V., Kilinç, B., & Kiliç, A. N. (2024). Erratum: Using the Mixed-Meta Method to Assess Portfolios in Science Teaching. Science Insights Education Frontiers, 24(2), 4003. Retrieved from https://bonoi.org/index.php/sief/article/view/1457
Issue
Vol. 24 No. 2 (2024)
Section
Erratum
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.