##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Feb 28, 2025

Yaodong Yang  

Abstract

Aneet (not in education, employment, or training) is a young person who is unemployed and not receiving education or vocational training. The term originated in the UK in the late 1990s, but with slight differences in its definition in various countries because of differential social and cultural contexts. The differences are mainly about the age range of NEETs and their intention of seeking a job or not (Batini et al). Each country has its own slang term for this group, such as “hikikomori” in Japan and “Ken Lao Zu” in China, pointing to the complexity and pervasiveness of the issue of NEETs. According to prior studies, the NEET status has a long-term negative impact on the individual’s economic circumstances (Ralston et al., 2022) and is also linked to higher risks of suicide and criminal behavior (Rahmani & Rahmani, 2024). From the social perspective, the NEET phenomenon signals the problems faced by the economy and the labor market. Therefore, it is imperative to develop effective measures to prevent at-risk youngsters from becoming NEETS and tackle the challenges encountered by this category.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

NEETs

References
Batini, F., Corallino, V., Toti, G., & Bartolucci, M. (2017). NEET: A phenomenon yet to be explored. Interchange, 48, 19-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-016-9290-x

Chen, Y. W. (2011). Once a NEET always a NEET? Experiences of employment and unemployment among youth in a job training programme in Taiwan. International Journal of Social Welfare, 20(1), 33-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2397.2009.00711.x

Maguire, S. (2015). NEET, unemployed, inactive or unknown–why does it matter? Educational Research, 57(2), 121-132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2015.1030850

Rahmani, H., & Groot, W. (2023). Risk factors of being a youth not in education, employment or training (NEET): A scoping review. International Journal of Educational Research, 120, 102198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2023.102198

Rahmani, H., Groot, W., & Rahmani, A. M. (2024). Unravelling the NEET phenomenon: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of risk factors for youth not in education, employment, or training. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 29(1), 2331576. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2024.2331576

Ralston, K., Everington, D., Feng, Z., & Dibben, C. (2022). Economic inactivity, not in employment, education or training (NEET) and scarring: The importance of NEET as a marker of long-term disadvantage. Work, Employment and Society, 36(1), 59-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017020973882

Stea, T. H., Bertelsen, T. B., Fegran, L., Sejersted, E., Kleppang, A. L., & Fyhn, T. (2024). Interventions targeting young people not in employment, education or training (NEET) for increased likelihood of return to school or employment—A systematic review. Plos one, 19(6), e0306285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306285

Wang, X. (2025). “Unfinished adult children”: A causal analysis of the issue of NEETs in China. Science Insights Education Frontiers, 26(2), 4349-4363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15354/sief.25.re462

Zudina, A. (2022). What makes youth become NEET? Evidence from Russia. Journal of Youth Studies, 25(5), 636-649. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2021.1923673
How to Cite
Yang, Y. (2025). Working to Tackle the Issue of NEETs. Science Insights Education Frontiers, 26(2), 4301–4303. https://doi.org/10.15354/sief.25.co401
Section
Commentary