Conceptual Change in Science Education: From Cold to Hot Approaches
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
Science education research finds that children may generate misunderstandings about certain scientific concepts based on their personal experiences prior to formal schooling. These misconceptions may present students with learning difficulties and barriers to deep comprehension of scientific knowledge. In response to this issue, researchers advanced the method of conceptual change instruction to help students shift from scientifically incorrect pre-instructional knowledge structures to scientifically accepted ones (Pacaci et al., 2024). Conceptual change has been deemed an effective approach to boosting students’ science literacy by improving teaching and learning in science education (Duit & Treagust, 2003; Treagust & Duit, 2008). Duit contended that conceptual change was not about an exchange of pre-instructional conceptions for the science concepts, but rather conceptual learning pathways from students’ pre-instructional conceptions to the science concepts to be learned (Duit, 1999; Duit & Treagust, 2003). Conceptual change studies can be traced back to the 1970s. There have been diverse perceptions of conceptual change in researchers, leading to the development of a variety of conceptual change strategies in science education.
Downloads
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Science, Eudcation
Duit, R. (1999). Conceptual change approaches in science education. In W. Schnotz, S. Vosniadou, & M. Carretero (Eds.), New perspectives on conceptual change (pp. 263-282). Amsterdam, NL: Pergamon.
Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International journal of science education, 25(6), 671-688. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305016
Kural, M. (2015). Teaching for Hot Conceptual Change: An Example of Photoelectric Effect. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(2), 85-124. Available at: https://web.archive.org/web/20160415165136id_/http://www.nef.balikesir.edu.tr/~dergi/makaleler/yayinda/19/EFMED_FZE197.pdf
Kural, M., & Kocakülah, M. S. (2016). Teaching for hot conceptual change: Towards a new model, beyond the cold and warm ones. European Journal of Education Studies, 2(8). Available at: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED573491.pdf
Pacaci, C., Ustun, U., & Ozdemir, O. F. (2024). Effectiveness of conceptual change strategies in science education: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 61(6), 1263-1325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21887
Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational research, 63(2), 167-199. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543063002167
Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211-227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730660207
Savas, E., & Kocakulah, A. (2025). The effect of hot conceptual change on students’ views on the nature of science. Science Insights Education Frontiers, 26(1), 4207-4231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15354/sief.25.or689
Sinatra, G. M. (2005). The" warming trend" in conceptual change research: The legacy of Paul R. Pintrich. Educational psychologist, 40(2), 107-115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4002_5
Treagust, D. F., & Duit, R. (2008). Conceptual change: A discussion of theoretical, methodological and practical challenges for science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3, 297-328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-008-9090-4

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.